Last updated:
3:26 PM, 21 May 2012



Jim Miller on Politics

  Email:
jimxc1 at gmail.com



What's he reading? Francis Parkman.

News Compilers
(Why These?)

A&L Daily
Drudge
egopnews.com
Hot Air
Jewish World Review
Lexis-Nexis
Lucianne
Mediaite
memeorandum
Monsters and Critics
Newsalert
Newsback
*newser
Orbusmax
Presseurop
Rantburg
Real Clear Politics
SciTech Daily
Yahoo


Big Media
(Why These?)

Atlantic Monthly
BBC
CNN
Chosen Ilbo
*Daily Mail (UK) *Deutsche Welle
Fox News
Globe and Mail (CA)
Guardian (UK)
Investor's Business Daily
Le Figaro (FR)
Le Monde (FR)
The Local (Sweden)
National Review
New Republic
New York Times
The New Yorker
Politico
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
Slate
Slashdot
The Spectator (UK)
Der Spiegel
Telegraph (UK)
Times (UK)
El Universal
U. S. News
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times


References:

Adherents
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Census Quick Facts
Dave Leip's Election Atlas
FactCheck
Federal Statistics
How Stuff Works
NationMaster
Refdesk
Snopes
StateMaster
Tax Facts
Unionstats
Wikipedia


Smart Media
(Why These?)

ABC News Note
The American Spectator
Michael Barone
City Journal
Commentary
Front Page Magazine
Michael Fumento
The Hill
Charles Krauthammer
Media Research
Michael Medved
New York Sun
Number Watch
Pajamas Media
Public Interest
Roll Call
Spinsanity
Tech Central Station
Townhall
The Weekly Standard


Blogs
(Why These?)

My Group Blog:
Sound Politics

Northwest:


The American Empire
AndrewsDad
Chief Brief
Clear Fog Blog
Coffeemonkey's weblog
Croker Sack
"DANEgerus"
Economic Freedom
Federal Way Conservative
Freedom Foundation
Hairy Thoughts
Huckleberry Online
Andy MacDonald
NW Republican
Orcinus
Public Interest Transportation Forum
<pudge/*>
Northwest Progressive Institute
*Progressive Majority
Matt Rosenberg
Seattle Blogger
Seattle Bubble
Washington Policy Center
West Sound Politics
Zero Base Thinking


Other US:


Ace of Spades HQ
Alien Corn
Ann Althouse
American Thinker
The Anchoress
Armies of Liberation
Art Contrarian
"Baldilocks"
Balloon Juice
Baseball Crank
La Shawn Barber
N. Z. Bear
Beldar
Bleat
Big Government
Bookworm Room
Broadband Politics
Stuart Buck
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Chef Mojo
Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Gina Cobb
Confederate Yankee
Jules Crittenden
Daily Pundit
Discriminations
Gregory Djerejian
Daniel W. Drezner
Econlog
Econopundit
Election Law
John Ellis
Engage
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Fausta
FiveThirtyEight
Flares into Darkness
Flopping Aces
The Long War Journal
Gateway Pundit
Grasping Reality With Both Hands
Keith Hennessey
Hugh Hewitt
Siflay Hraka
Instapundit
Iowahawk
Joanne Jacobs
Jeff Jarvis
The Jawa Report
Brothers Judd
JustOneMinute
Kausfiles
Kesher Talk
Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Greg Mankiw
Marginal Revolution
Mazurland
Megan McArdle
Minding the Campus
The ModerateVoice
Mudville Gazette
"neo-neocon"
Betsy Newmark
Newsbusters
No Watermelons Allowed
Ambra Nykola
*The Optimistic Conservative
The Ornery American
OxBlog
Parapundit
"Patterico"
Daniel Pipes
Polipundit
Political Arithmetik
Political Calculations
Pollster.com
Power and Control
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
QandO
Radio Equalizer
RedState
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Rightwing Nuthouse
Dr. Sanity
Scrappleface
Screw Loose Change
Linda Seebach
Sense of Events
Joshua Sharf
Rand Simberg
Smart Politics
Stability For Our Time
*Strange Maps
The Strata-Sphere
Andrew Sullivan
Don Surber
Sweetness & Light
Taking Hayek Seriously
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf
TigerHawk
USS Neverdock
VDH's Private Papers
Verum Serum
Villainous Company
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Monthly
Wizbang
Dr. Weevil
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Meryl Yourish
zombietime


Canadians:


*BlazingCatFur
Colby Cosh
Dust My Broom
Five Feet of Fury
Kate McMillan
Damian Penny
Bruce Rolston


Latin America:


Babalú
Caracas Chronicles
The Devil's Excrement
Venezuela News and Views


Overseas:


"Franco Aleman"
Bruce Bawer
Biased BBC
Tim Blair
Peter Briffa
Brussels Journal
*Bunyipitude
Butterflies and Wheels
Crooked Timber
Davids Medienkritik
Egyptian Sand Monkey
EU Referendum
Greenie Watch
Guido Fawkes
Harry's Place
Mick Hartley
Oliver Kamm
JG, Caesarea
¡No-Pasarán!
Fredrik Norman
Melanie Phillips
John Ray
samizdata
Shark Blog
Natalie Solent
Somtow's World
Bjørn Stærk
Laban Tall
Michael Yon
This is Zimbabwe

*Science Blogs:
The Blackboard
Cliff Mass Weather
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Climate Science
Future Pundit
Gene Expression
The Loom
In The Pipeline
Roger Pielke Jr.
Real Climate
A Voyage To Arcturus
Watts Up With That?

Media Blogs:
Andrew Malcolm
Dori Monson
David Postman
Rhetorical Ammo
Tierney Lab
*White House Dossier

R-Rated:
Horse's A**
Huffington Post

*new



Pseudo-Random Thoughts


Insider And Outsider Choices For Vice President:  In recent presidential elections — recent by my standards anyway — I've seen a strange pattern in vice-presidential choices, a pattern I was reminded of by the recent fuss over keeping Vice President Biden on the Democratic ticket.

Here's list of recent presidential candidates and their running mates.  Before each presidential candidate's name, I've put an "O" or "I", depending on whether I consider him an outsider or an insider.  The hardest to classify was Barack Obama, but I think insider is closest in his case, given his time in the Senate and the Illinois senate.  It may seem strange to see Carter still classified as an outsider after four years as president, but I think that fits the man — and the way he was seen in Washington.

(O) Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale
(I) Gerald Ford/Bob Dole
(O) Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale
(O) Ronald Reagan/George H. W. Bush
(I) Walter Mondale/Geraldine Ferraro
(O) Ronald Reagan/George H. W. Bush
(O) Michael Dukakis/Lloyd Bentsen
(I) George H. W. Bush/Dan Quayle
(O) Bill Clinton/Al Gore
(I) George H. W. Bush/Dan Quayle
(O) Bill Clinton/Al Gore
(I) Bob Dole/Jack Kemp
(I) Al Gore/Joe Lieberman
(O) George W. Bush/Dick Cheney
(I) John Kerry/John Edwards
(O) George W. Bush/Dick Cheney
(I) Barack Obama/Joe Biden
(I) John McCain/Sarah Palin

On the whole, outsiders seem to make better choices than insiders.  They are more likely, in my opinion, to pick a candidate who is ready to be president — should he (or she) have to be.  They are less likely, it seems to me, to make choices on almost purely political grounds.

And the very worst choice in that list, John Edwards, was made by the "most inside" insider of all, John Kerry.

(For the record:  I still think that Biden would be a better president than Barack Obama, as well as much more amusing president.)
- 3:26 PM, 21 May 2012   [link]


"Violence Erupted"  This morning, I learned from one of the local news programs that "violence erupted" at the NATO protests in Chicago.  That is, as you can see if you think about it for a minute or two, a very strange thing to say.

Strange, but telling, because the reporter, by putting it that way, absolves every human present at the protests, police, protesters, bystanders, or whoever, of any responsibility for the violence.  Come to think of it, that even absolves the police dogs, if there were any there, and there probably were.

And since both the police and the protesters were planning on violence, it makes about as much sense as saying that "violence erupted" at a prize fight.

(Almost obligatory ice hockey joke:  Joe was obviously unhappy after he came back from a hockey match.  His friend Sam asked him what was wrong, and Joe said:   "I went to see fights, and a hockey match broke out.")

Who was responsible for the violence?  Probably a minority of the protesters, though, this being Chicago, one can never be sure.  Either they started the violence, or they did something that forced the police to respond violently, like trying to get into a protected area.

(Here's a sample with the phrase from a Chicago newspaper.)
- 12:28 PM, 21 May 2012   [link]


Back From The Bug:  Over the weekend, I was fighting off some kind of bug, nothing very serious, but I didn't feel up to writing any posts for a couple of days.

Saturday and Sunday were the first days in more than a year that I haven't put up at least one post.

(It was an odd little bug.  I had four degrees of fever at the peak, and almost no other symptoms, other than an occasional dry cough.  I'm up to about 80 per cent of normal now, or maybe 75 per cent when I contemplate the cleaning up I have to do.)
- 6:10 AM, 21 May 2012   [link]


Because He Thought It Would Help Him Sell Books?  I've seen a lot of speculation on that claim that Obama was born in Kenya in his literary agents' biography.  (You can see some of the more thoughtful speculation here, from Roger Simon, who is, after all a published mystery writer.)

I'm inclined to think that the story came from Obama himself, and that he told it to the agents because he thought it would help book sales, if he pumped up his father's position in Kenya, and claimed a foreign birth for himself.

(Here's the original story from Breitbart.  Note that Obama's father is given a far higher position than he ever held in Kenya.)
- 4:23 PM, 18 May 2012   [link]


Need A Feel-Good Story For This Weekend?  Try this longish piece on Jamie Moyer, who made himself into a fine major league pitcher with years of intelligent work.

Sample:
By then Moyer had already pitched in the majors for 10 years and was a known quantity.  Or, as he puts it, "I wasn't a prospect, I was a suspect—someone they didn't trust."  Yet that time spent as a journeyman had also given him the chance to do something he does as well as anyone in the league: collect data.  "When you're in the big leagues, you have access to all the knowledge and all the info in the world," says Aaron Sele, a good friend who pitched with Moyer in Boston and Seattle.   "That doesn't mean people are going to digest it. But Jamie devours it."
Oh, and from everything I've seen, Moyer is a genuinely decent man, too.
Around [his wife] Karen are more than a dozen people who have flown out for the game, all part of Team Moyer.  There's Larry Platt, editor of the Philadelphia Daily News and co-author of Moyer's upcoming memoir; Moyer's parents; his sister, Jill; and two members of the Moyer Foundation, the philanthropic group that Jamie and Karen founded in 2000 that funds camps around the country for children dealing with the loss of a parent or one with substance-abuse problems.  Also present are six of his kids, including the two daughters he and Karen recently adopted from Guatemala, and the family's realtor, who helped the Moyers find the $1.8 million home in Cherry Creek that they're renting while he pursues this last chance with the Rockies.
On Wednesday, working hard as always, Moyer got a win — and two RBIs.
- 3:43 PM, 18 May 2012   [link]


A Labour Party Councillor Has Had An Unusual Political Evolution:  She is now a member of the Labour Party, and represents a district in Milton Keynes.  Before that, she was an active member of the Animal Liberation Front.

And before that, she was a neo-Nazi, under a different name.
The Citizen revealed last week how newly-elected Margaret Burke was a co-leader of the city’s November 9th Society in the 1980s.

Then called Margaret Flynn, she and her former husband Terry recruited a 50-strong army of skinheads to daub buildings with swastikas and hand out racist literature.
Without knowing more about her evolution, I won't try to make any connections between those three groups, but I thought the evolution itself interesting enough to deserve a post.

If you read the whole article, you'll find that the Conservatives are using this evolution to attack Labour for hypocrisy, that greatest of all modern sins.

(Here's a brief description of the November 9th Society.)
- 2:29 PM, 18 May 2012   [link]


Romney Rising:  According to Gallup.
Fifty percent of Americans now have a favorable opinion of presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, up from 39% in February and his highest by 10 percentage points.  His current 41% unfavorable rating, though, leaves him with a net score of +9, after being at -8 in February.  In roughly half of the 28 measurements Gallup has taken of Romney since 2006, more Americans have viewed him negatively than positively.
As you would expect, most of that increase has come from Republicans, but the Romney campaign must be pleased by the 11 per cent increase in favorability among independents.
- 9:16 AM, 18 May 2012   [link]


The Junior Congressman From California's 8th District Has Resigned:  As far as I can tell, almost none of the voters in that San Francisco district miss Jay Inslee, though I suppose the senior 8th district congresswoman, Nancy Pelosi, may.

In the 111th Congress, Jay inslee voted with his party leadership, that is to say, Nancy Pelosi, 99 per cent of the time.  He had decided, for whatever reasons, to follow her lead, to become a junior congressman representing her district, rather than represent Washington's 1st district.

If any of our local reporters think that Inslee's record is a legitimate issue in the governor's race, they may want to ask him why he spent that session of Congress representing San Francisco, rather than Bainbridge Island, Shoreline, Edmonds, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Bothell, Kirkland, and Redmond.

And if they are really enterprising, they may want to ask him whether he voted for Pelosi in the last leadership contest, and, if so, why.  (The votes in these leadership contests are secret, but we know that Heath Schuler received 43 votes.  Was one of those Inslee's?)

The current Almanac of American Politics has just two brief paragraphs on Inslee's accomplishments, but there is still enough there for reporters to begin asking him questions.  If, that is, they think questions about his record are legitimate.

Cross posted at Sound Politics.
- 8:43 AM, 18 May 2012   [link]


The Newly-Released Trayvon Martin Evidence Supports George Zimmerman's Claim Of Self Defense:  Last night I did something that I rarely do; I watched the beginnings of the ABC, NBC, and CBS national news programs.   All of them featured the newly-released evidence in the Trayvon Martin case; none of them said, explicitly, what any intelligent viewer could have figured out:  This evidence supports what Zimmerman says happened.

It was, to say the least, an odd experience, like watching a series of sports reports where all the scoring shown is by the team the announcer expects to lose.

(Incidentally, I thought the NBC report was the worst of the three.)

Supports, not proves.  But a defendant in a criminal trial does not have to prove his innocence, a legal subtlety that seems to have escaped the news readers and analysts on those programs; he only has to raise reasonable doubts about the prosecution's case.

Alan Dershowitz, who knows a little about the law, thinks that, if this newly-released evidence is valid, then the murder charge should be dropped.
A medical report by George Zimmerman’s doctor has disclosed that Zimmerman had a fractured nose, two black eyes, two lacerations on the back of his head and a back injury on the day after the fatal shooting.  If this evidence turns out to be valid, the prosecutor will have no choice but to drop the second-degree murder charge against Zimmerman — if she wants to act ethically, lawfully and professionally.

There is, of course, no assurance that the special prosecutor handling the case, State Attorney Angela Corey, will do the right thing.  Because until now, her actions have been anything but ethical, lawful and professional.
As you can see, he doesn't think much of the special prosecutor.

(Watching those three stories made me wonder, as I have before, just how smart our news readers are.  They really didn't seem to understand that the evidence they were describing undermined the stories they have been telling us.)
- 7:51 AM, 18 May 2012   [link]


Fajas And False Advertising:  Yesterday's New York Times had an article (and a front-page picture) on the growing popularity of "fajas", a traditional Colombian garment, now being used as, well, girdles.

I was partly prepared for this news, since I just recently learned about billionaire Sara Blakely, who became a billionaire by selling, well, girdles.

So many women want to look "shapely" or even "curvaceous", which will come as no surprise to almost everyone past puberty.  (Though you might not want to mention this in, for example, Women Studies 101.)

But there was one charming comment at the end of the faja article that did surprise me.  One young woman, who I will not name so as not to embarrass her further, said: "Your body is the way it is.  When you take it off, your body is still the same.  It's like false advertising."

I found that naive comment charming, but I can think of many industries where executives would be appalled by the comment.  Women and men use "false advertising" all the time, often with help from things they buy.

(Here's a somewhat dated example of the way some men try to deceive some women:  In Britain, some years ago, cell phones were a mark of status.  So some young men bought fake cell phones to take along to singles bars.  According to sociologists who observed this, those fake phones did make it easier for the men to meet women.

I'll leave examples of women trying to fool men with "false advertising" to others.)
- 2:57 PM, 17 May 2012   [link]


The People At Biased BBC will like the result of this contest.
The liberal media took another stunning defeat Tuesday as Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace totally demolished the BBC's Katty Kay on Jeopardy!.
Wallace finished with $22,400, Kay with $8,000, and Dr. Mehmet Oz with $5,900.

(For the record, although Kay is definitely on the left, Wallace is not necessarily a conservative.

He's harder to read, ideologically, than most journalists, but I would put him on the moderate left, even though he works for a generally conservative network, Fox News.   And I suppose the fact that I find a moderator hard to read is something of a compliment to Wallace.)
- 2:16 PM, 17 May 2012   [link]


Today's Seattle Times Editorial On Our Looming National Bankruptcy Is Bizarre:  The Obama administration is planning to bankrupt the country.  That isn't just what Republican partisans say, that's what their own numbers say.  Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner admitted that the administration has no plan to avoid bankruptcy — but says that he doesn't like the Republican plans he has seen.  (I'm not sure what his position is on the bipartisan Bowles-Simpson plan, but we do know that President Obama has, almost entirely, ignored it.)

For more than three years now, the Senate Democratic leadership, including our own senior senator, Patty Murray, has refused to even present a budget resolution — as required by law.

Since the Republican takeover of the House in the 2010 election, the Republican majority has presented a budget plan that would, according to official estimates, let us avoid national bankruptcy.  The Ryan plan may not be perfect — unlike all the other plans — but it should have been a place to start serious negotiations.

Instead, President Obama has, after one failed attempt to negotiate a grand bargain with the Republicans, gone back to nearly full-time campaigning.  Anyone who looks at his daily schedules, as I do from time to time, will notice that he rarely even meets with congressional leaders, much less spends the time necessary to work out a compromise.  I have my disagreements will all four of Obama's immediate predecessors, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2, but all of them were willing to try to achieve compromises on budgets, and all of them succeeded, to some extent.

President Obama is not even willing to try.

So who does the Seattle Times attack? Speaker Boehner.

That editorial attack is simply bizarre.

Cross posted at Sound Politics.

(There are also several budget plans from Republican senators, two of them serious enough to get more than 40 votes in the Senate.  To the best of my knowledge, no Democratic leader in the Senate — including our own Patty Murray — has even presented a budget plan in the last three years.)
- 1:16 PM, 17 May 2012   [link]


$1 Trillion?  That, according to Doug McWilliams, of the Centre for Economic and Business Research, is how much Greece's exit could cost the eurozone.
The British government is making urgent preparations to cope with the fallout of a possible Greek exit from the single currency, after the governor of the Bank of England, Sir Mervyn King, warned that Europe was "tearing itself apart".

Reports from Athens that massive sums of money were being spirited out of the country intensified concern in London about the impact of a splintering of the eurozone on a UK economy that is stuck in double-dip recession. One estimate put the cost to the eurozone of Greece making a disorderly exit from the currency at $1tn, 5% of output.
(By way of comparison, Greece's GDP is somewhere around $300 billion.)

But, cheery fellow that he is, McWilliams thinks that a "planned breakup" would only cost the eurozone about $300 billion.  He favors that alternative, since he considers the breakup inevitable.

He's probably right about the inevitability.

(I have no idea whether his numbers are plausible, or even how he calculated them.   You can find a little more of his thinking in this press release.

McWilliams does think that the eurozone will be better off in the long run if they abandon the euro, but few elected officials are likely to get excited by the idea that they will ahead in 2025 if they take harsh measures now.)
- 9:06 AM, 17 May 2012   [link]


President Obama Has United The Senate:  Again.   In opposition to his budgets.
A budget resolution based on President Obama’s 2013 budget failed to get any votes in the Senate on Wednesday.

In a 99-0 vote, all of the senators present rejected the president’s blueprint.

It’s the second year in a row the Senate has voted down Obama’s budget.

Obama's 2012 budget failed 97 to 0 last May after Obama himself last April said he wanted deeper deficit cuts.
This year, the House also rejected Obama's budget — unanimously.

All this is amusing — and infuriating.  The Senate Democrats have refused to perform their most essential task for three years now, have refused to pass any budget resolution at all.

(Why are the Senate Democrats refusing to present a budget?  For many reasons, but mostly because, if they were honest, they would be calling for tax increases, though not immediately.  They want to force the Republicans to take partial responsibility for those tax increases.)
- 8:33 AM, 17 May 2012   [link]


Mike Royko On Absentee Ballots:  In his biography of the first (and, by far the most important) Mayor Daley, Mike Royko explains many things about machine politics, Chicago style, including why precinct captains liked absentee ballots.
If they prevented the common practices, imaginative precinct captains would merely turn to others.  In some wards, politically obligated doctors signs stacks of blank affidavits, attesting to the illness of people they have never seen, thus permitting the precinct captain to vote the people in their homes as absentee voters for reasons of illness. (p. 77)
At that time, absentee ballots were much harder to get, in every, or almost every, state.   But the precinct captains in Chicago's poorer areas had other ways to violate the secrecy of the ballot.  At the time Royko wrote, quite extraordinary numbers of voters — in some wards — would need "assistance" voting, assistance that allowed the precinct captains to go into the voting booth with them.

As practical men — and they were almost all men at that time — the precinct captains understood that voters might well accept a favor, anything from a cheap bottle of wine to a favorable zoning decision, and then go into that voting booth and vote for the "wrong" candidates.

And so the precinct captains tried — when they could get away with it — to see how their voters voted, either by "assisting" them, or by watching them fill out absentee ballots.

Now, in every, or almost every, state, we have made it easy for political operatives to see how people vote.

(Eastern Kentucky has had chronic vote fraud problems.  There are two aspects about it that differentiate it from other areas with similar problems.  In that area, from what I can tell, Republicans as well as Democrats regularly engage in vote fraud.

And the political operatives there are often willing to pass out bribes without seeing how the person votes.  I attribute that to, as odd as this may seem, an old-fashioned sense of honor in the area.  A man might agree that it was wrong to accept a bribe for a vote — but think it even more wrong not to keep your word, if you had accepted such a bribe.

If you know more about eastern Kentucky than I do, feel free to correct me on both points.)
- 2:57 PM, 16 May 2012   [link]


Time For A Pie Summit Between Oprah And Michelle?   That's what peacemaker John Kass suggests.

(Kass errs, I think, in his pie suggestions.  Since this is an election year, they should have that all-American favorite, apple pie.)
- 8:38 AM, 16 May 2012   [link]


Archives

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2
November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3

January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4
October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4
June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. and Part 4

January 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2012, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3






Coming Soon
  • FDR and Waterboarding
  • How Long Do Wars Last?
  • Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, and Crescent Wrenches
  • De-Lawyering and Attorney General McKenna


Coming Eventually
  • JFK and Wiretaps
  • Green Republicans
  • The Rise and Fall and Rise of Black Voting
  • Abortion, Cleft Palates, and Europe
  • Kweisi Mfume's Children
  • Public Opinion During Other US Wars
  • Dual Loyalties
  • The Power Index
  • Baby Dancing
  • Jocks, but no Nerds
  • The Four Caliphs




Best Posts


Books


Strange Obama


The Unknown Bush


University Reform


Uncorrected Mistakes


Vote Fraud


The Gang of Four


Articles


Assignment Desk
(What's This?)


Columns


Common Mistakes
(What's This?)


Chomsky Cult Program


*new