Last updated:
12:54 PM, 9 February 2010



Jim Miller on Politics

  Email:
jimxc1 at gmail.com



What's he reading? Francis Parkman.

News Compilers
(Why These?)

A&L Daily
Drudge
egopnews.com
Hot Air
Jewish World Review
Lexis-Nexis
Lucianne
memeorandum
Monsters and Critics
Newsback
NewsFifty
Orbusmax
Rantburg
Real Clear Politics
SciTech Daily
Yahoo


Big Media
(Why These?)

Atlantic Monthly
BBC
CNN
Fox News
Globe and Mail (CA)
Guardian (UK)
*Investor's Business Daily
Le Figaro (FR)
Le Monde (FR)
*The Local (Sweden)
National Review
New Republic
New York Times
The New Yorker
*The Politico
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
Slate
Slashdot
The Spectator (UK)
*Der Spiegel
Telegraph (UK)
Times (UK)
U. S. News
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
*Washington Examiner
Washington Post
*Washington Times


References:

Adherents
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Census Quick Facts
Historical Statistics of the United States
Dave Leip's Election Atlas
FactCheck
Federal Statistics
How Stuff Works
NationMaster
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Refdesk
Snopes
StateMaster
Tax Facts
Unionstats
Wikipedia


Internet Tools:

BugMeNot
Scirus
WebEnalysis
Webmonkey


Smart Media
(Why These?)

ABC News Note
The American Spectator
Michael Barone
City Journal
Commentary
Morton Kondracke
Front Page Magazine
Michael Fumento
The Hill
Charles Krauthammer
Media Research
Michael Medved
New York Sun
Number Watch
*Pajamas Media
Jim Pinkerton
Public Interest
Roll Call
Spinsanity
Tech Central Station
Townhall
The Weekly Standard


Blogs
(Why These?)

My Group Blog:
Sound Politics

Northwest:


*The American Empire
AndrewsDad
Chief Brief
*Clear Fog Blog
*Coffeemonkey's weblog
Croker Sack
"DANEgerus"
Economic Freedom
*Evergreen Freedom Foundation
*Federal Way Conservative
The Flag of the World
*Hairy Thoughts
Huckleberry Online
Island Republican
Andy MacDonald
*Mason County Conservative Book Club
My Own Side
NW Republican
Orcinus
*Public Interest Transportation Forum
*<pudge/*>
Pull on Superman's Cape
*Seattle Blogger
Red County
Matt Rosenberg
Seattle Bubble
Michael Totten
the underdogblog
*Washington Policy Center
*West Sound Politics
Zero Base Thinking


Other US:


*Ace of Spades HQ
FiveThirtyEight
Alien Corn
The Anchoress
Ann Althouse
American Thinker
Ankle Biting Pundits
Steve Antler
Back Talk
"Baldilocks"
Balloon Juice
*Baseball Crank
La Shawn Barber
Michael Barone
Austin Bay
N. Z. Bear
*Beldar
Belmont Club
Rebecca Blood
*Big Government
2 Blowhards
*Bookworm Room
*Broadband Politics
Jeff Brokaw
J. Bowen
Chicago Boyz
David Burge
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Stuart Buck
Byrd Droppings
Phil Carter
Chef Mojo
Citizen Smash
Classical Values
Gina Cobb
Code Blue
*Confederate Yankee
Susanna Cornett
David Crawford
Jules Crittenden
Counterterrorism
Gerry Daly
Brad DeLong
Democratic Peace
Diplomad
Discriminations
Gregory Djerejian
Daniel W. Drezner
Kevin Drum
*Econlog
Election Law
Eject! Eject! Eject!
John Ellis
Dean Esmay
Amitai Etzioni
Gary Farber
*Fausta
Flares into Darkness
Flopping Aces
*The Fourth Rail
Joe Gandelman
Gateway Pundit
Christopher Genovese
*Global Labor and Politics
Rich Hailey
Henry Hanks
*Keith Hennessey
Hugh Hewitt
Bill Hobbs
David Hogberg
Siflay Hraka
David Huber
Instapundit
Jeff Jarvis
Joanne Jacobs
The Jawa Report
Charles Johnson
Brothers Judd
Mickey Kaus
Kesher Talk
*King Harvest
*Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion
Jim Lileks
Michael Lopez
Donald Luskin
Tom Maguire
Michelle Malkin
Greg Mankiw
*Marginal Revolution
Joshua Marshall
Mazurland
Megan McArdle
Jeff and Stephanie Medcalf
MedPundit
H. D. Miller
*Minding the Campus
Diane E. Moon
Edward Morrissey
Rodger Morrow
Mudville Gazette
Robert Musil
Mutated Monkeys
My Election Analysis
Mystery Pollster
Pete Nelson
"neo-neocon"
Betsy Newmark
Newsbusters
Jane Novak
OmbudsGod
The Ornery American
Jack O'Toole
Oxblog
"Patterico"
Randall Parker
"Lynxx Pherrett"
Daniel Pipes
Polipundit
Political Teen
Political Arithmetik
Political Calculations
*Power and Control
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
QandO
Bill Quick
Radio Equalizer
Greg Ransom
Red State
*Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Rightwing Nuthouse
Patrick Ruffini
Dr. Sanity
Alec Saunders
Scrappleface
Screw Loose Change
*Linda Seebach
Sense of Events
Donald Sensing
Joshua Sharf
Rand Simberg
Chuck Simmins
Geitner Simmons
Roger Simon
*Smart Politics
The Smoking Room
Reid Stott
The Strata-Sphere
Andrew Sullivan
*Don Surber
Sweetness & Light
Tacitus
TalkLeft
*TaxProf
Chip Taylor
TigerHawk
USS Neverdock
VDH's Private Papers
*Villainous Company
Volokh Conspiracy
Wizbang
Dr. Weevil
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Matthew Yglesias
Meryl Yourish
Pejman Yousefzadeh
*zombietime


Canadians:


Colby Cosh
*Dust My Broom
Five Feet of Fury
Kate McMillan
Damian Penny
Bruce Rolston


Latin America:


Babalu
Caracas Chronicles
Mark in Mexico
Venezuela News and Views


Overseas:


"Franco Aleman"
"Alexei"
Bruce Bawer
Biased BBC
"Big Pharoah"
Bilious Young Fogey
Tim Blair
Peter Briffa
Brussels Journal
Scott Burgess
Butterflies and Wheels
Charko
Arthur Chrenkoff
Crooked Timber
Davids Medienkritik
Egyptian Sand Monkey
EU Referendum
Europundits
Fear and Loathing in Paris
Greenie Watch
Harry's Place
Mick Hartley
Iraq the Model
Oliver Kamm
*The Other War
¡No-Pasarán!
Fredrik Norman
Melanie Phillips
John Ray
samizdata
Shark Blog
Natalie Solent
Bjørn Stærk
Laban Tall
Viking Pundit
Michael Yon
*This is Zimbabwe

*Science Blogs:
*The Blackboard
Cliff Mass Weather
Climate Audit
Climate Science
Future Pundit
Gene Expression
The Loom
In The Pipeline
*Roger Pielke Jr.
*Real Climate
A Voyage To Arcturus
Watts Up With That?

Media Blogs:
*Dori Monson
David Postman
Rhetorical Ammo
Tierney Lab
Top of the Ticket

R-Rated:
*Horse's A**
*Huffington Post

Dormant:
Adragna and Vehrs
"Hans Ze Beeman"
Steven Chapman
Cinderella Bloggerfeller
Brian Crouch
Steven Den Beste
Gregg Easterbrook
Election Reforms
Solly Ezekiel
Guns and Butter
Hamilton's Pamphlets
Horologium
Marsha Louise
Media Minded
Charles Murtaugh
Dagh Nielsen
Ambra Nykola
Aaron Oakley
David Russell
SharksWithLasers
Tobacco Road
Wax Tadpole

*new



Pseudo-Random Thoughts


Even The New York Times Is Catching On:  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its leader are in trouble.
Just over two years ago, Rajendra K. Pachauri seemed destined for a scientist's version of sainthood: A vegetarian economist-engineer who leads the United Nations' climate change panel, he accepted the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the panel, sharing the honor with former Vice President Al Gore.

But Dr. Pachauri and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are now under intense scrutiny, facing accusations of scientific sloppiness and potential financial conflicts of interest from climate skeptics, right-leaning politicians and even some mainstream scientists.  Senator John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, called for Dr. Pachauri's resignation last week.

Critics, writing in Britain's Sunday Telegraph and elsewhere, have accused Dr. Pachauri of profiting from his work as an adviser to businesses, including Deutsche Bank and Pegasus Capital Advisors, a New York investment firm — a claim he denies.
The phrase "scientific sloppiness" is too mild, in my opinion (though it may meet standards at the New York Times).  Critics have found that some of the evidence the IPCC has been using to make its case is wrong, and that some of their wilder assertions come from non-scientific sources.

The accusations of conflicts of interest worry me less than the sloppiness.  But I would say that Pachauri has not even tried to avoid those conflicts.

(If you are wondering why the New York Times is so late to this party, read some of the posts by Andrew Revkin, who has been covering these issues for the Times.  He long ago chose to be as much an advocate as a reporter, and set aside his reporter's skepticism when covering the IPCC.)
- 12:54 PM, 9 February 2010   [link]


NPR's Mark Memmott Finds It Hard To Believe That Some Of Us Miss President Bush:  But some of us do, and one person has even put up a billboard to say so.

(More here.)
- 7:50 AM, 9 February 2010   [link]


Will John Murtha's District Go Republican?   Probably.
Presumably there will be a special election in Pennsylvania 12 to replace Murtha on May 18, which is primary day.  This is the only district in the nation that voted for John Kerry in 2004 and John McCain in 2008.  You might want to explain that as an affinity for Vietnam veterans.   The better explanation is that it is part of the Jacksonian belt that starts in southwest Pennsylvania and extends along the Appalachians and southwestward to Tennessee and Texas—an area where Barack Obama ran very poorly in both the primaries and the general election in 2008.  In any case, it voted only narrowly (51%-49%) for Kerry and favored McCain over Obama by an even narrower margin (49%-49%, a margin of 873 votes).
(In 2000, Gore carried the district, 55-44, with a margin of 29,509 votes.)

Michael Barone doesn't give odds, but I will.  Right now, I would say that the odds favor the Republican candidate, by at least 3-2.
- 7:07 AM, 9 February 2010   [link]


Congratulations To The Danish Special Forces:  For this successful action against Somali pirates.
Danish special forces yesterday stormed a ship captured by armed Somali pirates and freed the 25 crew on board, marking the first time a warship has intervened during a hijacking in the troubled area.
(It wasn't the first time a warship has intervened there, but let's not quibble about details in the account.)

The Danes didn't meet resistance, which is good, I suppose, but it's too bad that they didn't capture some of the pirates, who might have given us useful intelligence.
- 1:51 PM, 8 February 2010   [link]


We Aren't Worthy Of Obama:  So says Jacob Weisberg.
In trying to explain why our political paralysis seems to have gotten so much worse over the past year, analysts have rounded up a plausible collection of reasons including: President Obama's tactical missteps, the obstinacy of congressional Republicans, rising partisanship in Washington, the blustering idiocracy of the cable-news stations, and the Senate filibuster, which has devolved into a super-majority threshold for any important legislation.  These are all large factors, to be sure, but that list neglects what may be the biggest culprit in our current predicament: the childishness, ignorance, and growing incoherence of the public at large.
(Emphasis added.)

I feel guilty already.  Or I would feel guilty if I didn't remember that President Bush faced the same obstacles and an extraordinarily hostile press corps, and still managed to get things done.

Years and years ago, I ran across a study of candidates which found that the winning candidates thought better of the voters than the losing candidates.  No great surprise there, but it is amusing to see Weisberg, and so many others on the left, get this angry with the voters after the loss of Ted Kennedy's senate seat and Obama's legislative failures.

(Incidentally, it is simply absurd to say that the problems Weisberg points out have gotten "so much worse over the past year".  There is a simple explanation for our "political paralysis".  As Jay Cost explains, Obama and Pelosi are trying to pass a leftwing agenda that does not have the support of a broad majority.  The Constitution was designed to make large changes difficult without broad support, and is working as designed.)
- 1:04 PM, 8 February 2010   [link]


LED Lights Are Becoming Available:  And, in time, they will be a better solution than either incandescents or fluorescents.

Early adopter Anthony Watts installed some in his home, and is pleased with the result.  His experience shows the kind of work switching to LED lights can require when they are replacing conventional recessed lights.  (There are some LED lights that do not require new fixtures.)

I'll be looking at LEDs in the future, as the prices come down and the performance improves, even though they do not save as much money for me as they do for most others.  (My apartment has electric heat.  Everything else being equal, I would rather heat it with lights in the winter, to dispel the Seattle area gloom, than with heaters.)

One reason I will looking for LED alternatives is that I am somewhat less positive on compact fluorescents than I was when I first began using them.  So far, I have not found any that are good for working with photos.  The light output from them appears to decline as they age.  And I have had two fail dramatically, probably leaking pollutants.

In contrast, I've been quite pleased with the LED lantern that I bought for camping and emergencies.  (I doubt that my model is still available, but it is not hard to find equivalent models; for example.)  The light from mine is unnatural, but is quite usable for reading, even with my older eyes.
- 11:05 AM, 8 February 2010   [link]


Helen Thomas Attacks Obama:  Yes, that Helen Thomas.
Still, a press corps that periodically complained about George W. Bush's infrequent news conferences should not let Obama walk away from the practice unchallenged.  And some of its members have protested.  [CBS White House correspondent Chip] Reid raised the issue with Gibbs at a briefing last month, and Hearst columnist Helen Thomas said the president has "gone an obscenely long time, not holding one."
Obama last held a press conference in July, 2009.  It is almost as if he is avoiding questions from a group that includes a few skeptical reporters.  (Or, possibly, he is avoiding press conferences when they won't be on national TV, in prime time.)
- 9:29 AM, 8 February 2010   [link]


Great Green Police Ad:  It's good to see this kind of warning about how the Greens want to control every aspect of our lives.


But I don't know why they stuck that bit in about the car company.  (It's a German car company.  Were they, perhaps, referring to a certain unfortunate 20th century German regime, led by a vegetarian who was fond of the natural environment?)
- 8:33 AM, 8 February 2010   [link]


Charles Blow Forgets Independents:  The party that wins the most independents usually wins national elections.  Is that idea too complicated?

It is for Charles Blow whose Saturday column never mentions independents.  Calling the column an analysis would be giving it too much credit, since it does not have a coherent argument.  Instead, Blow shows us that Democrats and Republicans have very different assessments of President Obama — no surprise there — and tells us that he thinks that Obama is now being more effective politically because he is appealing to — Charles Blow.

But Blow never mentions independents in the column.  (And I can see why not, since independents have moved sharply against Obama and the Democrats in three high-profile elections in Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts.)  Obama being a partisan Democrat will please people like Blow, but will alienate independents.

(This mistake is extremely common among activists on both the the left and right, though Blow's version is exceptionally crude.  It is easy to think that if our parties would only do what we want them to, they would win.  Dick Morris, and any other election analyst worth his fees, can tell you that ain't necessarily so.)
- 7:39 PM, 7 February 2010   [link]


Someone At The Associated Press Doesn't Like Sarah Palin:  If you doubt that, take a look at the photograph they chose to illustrate this article.  Someone must have gone to great lengths to find that picture, since Palin is, as we all know, an attractive woman, who smiles frequently in public.  Few pictures of her make her look bad or hostile, so the editor who chose this one must have gone through many pictures to find one that did both.

(Do the people who make such choices at the AP realize that this makes them look silly?  I suspect not; I suspect that they are so consumed by dislike for Palin that the photo looks right to them.)
- 9:21 AM, 7 February 2010   [link]


Some Dinosaurs Were Brightly Colored:  For example, Anchiornis huxleyi.

I am almost as impressed by the method they used, and their certainty that it works on dinosaurs in the same way it works on birds, as I am by this discovery.

(An image search on the name shows that paleontologists are rather unimaginative.)
- 3:23 PM, 5 February 2010
Much more from the National Geographic, including a fancy rotating image of the reconstructed dinosaur.  (To me, Anchiornis huxleyi looks something like a fancy roadrunner.)
- 3:20 PM, 7 February 2010   [link]


Every Economist?  Whenever Obama makes one of these wild claims, I worry that he believes what he said.
President Obama veered off script — and away from the facts — when he spoke about the stimulus bill today in Nashua, NH.

"Now, if you hear some of the critics, they'll say, well, the Recovery Act, I don't know if that's really worked, because we still have high unemployment," the president said.  "But what they fail to understand is that every economist, from the left and the right, has said, because of the Recovery Act, what we've started to see is at least a couple of million jobs that have either been created or would have been lost.
(Emphasis added.)

Jake Tapper then lists some economists who do not agree with Obama.

When a politician tells me something that absurd, I can explain it in two different ways; either they don't believe what they said and think I am a sucker, or they believe it, at least when they say it.

I don't claim to know which explanation is right in this case.  But I have seen so many of these absurdities from Obama that I am beginning to think that he doesn't care whether what he says is true, he just cares about the immediate effect it will have on his audience.

But it is certainly possible that he believes what he said, and not just when he said it.  And that kind of delusion is far more worrisome than a routine political lie.
- 9:49 AM, 5 February 2010   [link]


India Wants To Use The Best Science On Climate Issues:  So, India is establishing a Himalayan research institute and forming its own body to assess climate change issues, instead of relying on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Here's the gist of the announcements from environment minister Jairam Ramesh:
He announced the Indian government will established a separate National Institute of Himalayan Glaciology to monitor the effects of climate change on the world's 'third ice cap', and an 'Indian IPCC' to use 'climate science' to assess the impact of global warming throughout the country.

"There is a fine line between climate science and climate evangelism.  I am for climate science.  I think people misused [the] IPCC report, [the] IPCC doesn't do the original research which is one of the weaknesses . . . they just take published literature and then they derive assessments, so we had goof-ups on Amazon forest, glaciers, snow peaks.

"I respect the IPCC but India is a very large country and cannot depend only on [the] IPCC and so we have launched the Indian Network on Comprehensive Climate Change Assessment (INCCA)," he said.
It is almost as if Ramesh doesn't trust the IPCC's science.  And some of us think that the United States should consider following India's lead.

(I think he's just being polite when he says that he respects the IPCC.)
- 8:59 AM, 5 February 2010   [link]


Worth Reading:  Though you may have to go to a library to find these two pieces.  (Or subscribe to the Wall Street Journal.)

Ann Marlowe, a writer who "travels frequently to Afghanistan", says that we are "lurching toward defeat" in Afghanistan because our strategy is all wrong.  I don't know enough about the situation there to endorse her views, but I found some of her critiques interesting.  For instance, it does seem that she is right when she says that we should kill Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, not negotiate with him.

Andy Kessler, the author of How We Got Here, says that we should solve our banking problems by gradually increasing reserve requirements, by, if you will, "de-leveraging" our banks.  What he says makes sense to me.  In fact, it is something I have long favored.
- 8:27 AM, 5 February 2010   [link]


No Jobs Bill?  No problem.  Majority Leader Reid is scheduling a vote on one anyway.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced this morning at a press conference that there will be a vote in the Senate on Monday on a "jobs bill."  It would be a procedural vote to start debating the bill.

The problem is, nobody has yet written one down.  And reporters at Reid’s press conference, called to announce a new "jobs agenda," were given an impressive-looking packet with a cover sheet that reads "Democratic Jobs Agenda" with the sub-headline "Putting America Back to Work."

But underneath the cover page is 2.5 pages of bullet-point ideas with no specifics.
A few people — most of them Republicans, no doubt — will wonder whether it might be better to hold hearings first, then write a bill, and then vote on it.  But I doubt that Reid will pay much attention to such quibblers.
- 6:28 AM, 5 February 2010   [link]


Archives

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2
November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3

January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4
October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4
June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. and Part 4

January 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2010, Part 1 and Part 2






Coming Soon
  • Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, and Crescent Wrenches
  • De-Lawyering and Attorney General McKenna


Coming Eventually
  • JFK and Wiretaps
  • Green Republicans
  • The Rise and Fall and Rise of Black Voting
  • Abortion, Cleft Palates, and Europe
  • Kweisi Mfume's Children
  • Public Opinion During Other US Wars
  • Dual Loyalties
  • The Power Index
  • Baby Dancing
  • Jocks, but no Nerds
  • The Four Caliphs



Best Posts


Books


Strange Obama


The Unknown Bush


University Reform


Vilsack Meter


Uncorrected Mistakes


Vote Fraud


The Gang of Four


Articles


Assignment Desk
(What's This?)


Columns


Common Mistakes
(What's This?)


Letters


Chomsky Cult Program


*new