Last updated:
2:08 PM, 25 May 2013



Jim Miller on Politics

  Email:
jimxc1 at gmail.com



What's he reading? Francis Parkman.

News Compilers
(Why These?)

A&L Daily
Drudge
egopnews.com
Hot Air
Jewish World Review
Lexis-Nexis
Lucianne
Mediaite
memeorandum
Monsters and Critics
Newsalert
Newsback
*newser
Orbusmax
Presseurop
Rantburg
Real Clear Politics
SciTech Daily
Yahoo


Big Media
(Why These?)

Atlantic Monthly
BBC
CNN
Chosen Ilbo
*Daily Mail (UK)
*Deutsche Welle
Fox News
Globe and Mail (CA)
Guardian (UK)
Investor's Business Daily
Le Figaro (FR)
Le Monde (FR)
The Local (Sweden)
National Review
New Republic
New York Times
The New Yorker
Politico
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
Slate
Slashdot
The Spectator (UK)
Der Spiegel
Telegraph (UK)
Times (UK)
El Universal
U. S. News
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times


References:

Adherents
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Census Quick Facts
Dave Leip's Election Atlas
FactCheck
Federal Statistics
How Stuff Works
NationMaster
Refdesk
Snopes
StateMaster
Tax Facts
Unionstats
Wikipedia


Smart Media
(Why These?)

ABC News Note
*The American
The American Spectator
Michael Barone
City Journal
Commentary
Front Page Magazine
Michael Fumento
The Hill
Charles Krauthammer
Media Research
Michael Medved
New York Sun
Number Watch
PJ Media
Public Interest
Roll Call
Spinsanity
Townhall
The Weekly Standard


Blogs
(Why These?)

My Group Blog:
Sound Politics

Northwest:


The American Empire
AndrewsDad
Chief Brief
Clear Fog Blog
Coffeemonkey's weblog
Croker Sack
"DANEgerus"
Economic Freedom
Federal Way Conservative
Freedom Foundation
Hairy Thoughts
Huckleberry Online
Andy MacDonald
NW Republican
Orcinus
Public Interest Transportation Forum
<pudge/*>
Northwest Progressive Institute
*Progressive Majority
Matt Rosenberg
Seattle Blogger
Seattle Bubble
Washington Policy Center
West Sound Politics
Zero Base Thinking


Other US:


Ace of Spades HQ
Alien Corn
Ann Althouse
American Thinker
The Anchoress
Armies of Liberation
Art Contrarian
*Asymmetrical Information
"Baldilocks"
Balloon Juice
Baseball Crank
La Shawn Barber
Beldar
Bleat
Big Government
Bookworm Room
Broadband Politics
Stuart Buck
Keith Burgess-Jackson
*Bush Center
Chef Mojo
Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
*College Insurrection
Confederate Yankee
Jules Crittenden
Daily Pundit
Discriminations
Gregory Djerejian
Daniel W. Drezner
Econlog
Econopundit
Election Law
John Ellis
Engage
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Fausta
FiveThirtyEight
Flares into Darkness
Flopping Aces
The Long War Journal
Gateway Pundit
Grasping Reality With Both Hands
Keith Hennessey
Hugh Hewitt
Siflay Hraka
Instapundit
Iowahawk
Joanne Jacobs
Jeff Jarvis
The Jawa Report
Brothers Judd
JustOneMinute
Kausfiles
Kesher Talk
Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Greg Mankiw
Marginal Revolution
Mazurland
Minding the Campus
The ModerateVoice
Mudville Gazette
"neo-neocon"
Betsy Newmark
Newsbusters
No Watermelons Allowed
Ambra Nykola
*The Optimistic Conservative
The Ornery American
OxBlog
Parapundit
"Patterico"
Daniel Pipes
Polipundit
Political Arithmetik
Political Calculations
Pollster.com
Power and Control
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
QandO
Radio Equalizer
RedState
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Rightwing Nuthouse
Dr. Sanity
Scrappleface
Screw Loose Change
Linda Seebach
Sense of Events
Joshua Sharf
Rand Simberg
Smart Politics
The Spirit of Enterprise
Stability For Our Time
*Strange Maps
The Strata-Sphere
Andrew Sullivan
Don Surber
Sweetness & Light
Taking Hayek Seriously
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf
USS Neverdock
VDH's Private Papers
Verum Serum
Villainous Company
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Monthly
Wizbang
Dr. Weevil
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Meryl Yourish
zombietime


Canadians:


*BlazingCatFur
Colby Cosh
Five Feet of Fury
Kate McMillan
Damian Penny
Bruce Rolston


Latin America:


Babalú
Caracas Chronicles
The Devil's Excrement
Venezuela News and Views


Overseas:


"Franco Aleman"
Bruce Bawer
Biased BBC
Tim Blair
Peter Briffa
Brussels Journal
*Bunyipitude
Butterflies and Wheels
Crooked Timber
Davids Medienkritik
Egyptian Sand Monkey
EU Referendum
Greenie Watch
Guido Fawkes
Harry's Place
Mick Hartley
Oliver Kamm
JG, Caesarea
*Le Monde Watch
¡No-Pasarán!
Fredrik Norman
Melanie Phillips
John Ray
samizdata
Shark Blog
Natalie Solent
Somtow's World
Bjørn Stærk
Laban Tall
Michael Yon
This is Zimbabwe

*Science Blogs:
The Blackboard
Cliff Mass Weather
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Climate Science
Future Pundit
Gene Expression
The Loom
In The Pipeline
Roger Pielke Jr.
Real Climate
A Voyage To Arcturus
Watts Up With That?

Media Blogs:
Andrew Malcolm
Dori Monson
David Postman
Rhetorical Ammo
Tierney Lab
*White House Dossier

R-Rated:
Horse's A**
Huffington Post

*new



Pseudo-Random Thoughts


Scientific American: "Most People Believe That They Are Above Average, A Statistical Impossibility."  So says Ozgun Atasoy, "a doctoral candidate in the Department of Marketing at Boston University".

Actually, it's not impossible if you are using the most common meaning of "average", the arithmetic mean.

Example:  Three young guys and I walk into a bar together.  Though we don't know it, a group of young women are rating each of us on the usual 0-10 scale.  They give each of my young friends a 6, and, perhaps out of charity, the old guy a 2.  The rest is left as an exercise for the reader.

A majority can also be below average.  The majority of families in the Seattle suburb of Medina have wealth below the average for the town, since Bill and Melinda Gates live there.

On the other hand, if by "average", you mean the median, then it is true that only half of a population can be above it.

But it isn't true for another common average, the mode.

(The post includes some interesting examples of our tendency to over-rate our own abilities and qualities.)
- 2:08 PM, 24 May 2013   [link]


The Best Explanation I've Seen So Far For The I-5 Skagit Bridge Collapse is in this set of diagrams, from the Seattle Times.

(I can add a little bit of background and some speculation.  Washington state requires high loads to get permits.  Those loads must be preceded by a pilot vehicle with a vertical pole the same height as the highest point on the truck.

The truck did have a permit, and did have a pilot vehicle, a pickup truck with the required pole.   So far, I have not seen or heard whether that pole on the pickup hit the bridge.  (A caller to a news show said that the driver of the pilot vehicle, not the driver of the truck, is responsible for making sure they have enough clearance.  That seems reasonable, but I haven't seen or heard any confirmation of that claim.)

However, since the pole was mounted at the front middle of the pickup, it is possible that the pole on the pickup did not hit the bridge.

Now for some speculation.  I have heard that another truck passed the truck with the oversized load, just as it was approaching the bridge, pinning the oversized truck in the right lane.  It is possible that the truck with the oversized load might have been able to cross the bridge safely if it had been in the middle of the two lanes.

There's more background in this Seattle Times article, and there's a description of other notable Pacific Northwest bridge failures in this article.)
- 1:00 PM, 25 May 2013   [link]


Like Father, Like Son?  Joseph Kennedy was a brilliant businessman, and an exceptionally nasty man.  His political career died when, as ambassador to Great Britain during World War II, he was openly defeatist.
Throughout 1938, while the Nazi persecution of the Jews in Germany and Austria intensified, Kennedy attempted to arrange a meeting with Adolf Hitler.[34]  Shortly before the Nazi aerial bombing of British cities began in September 1940, Kennedy once again sought a personal meeting with Hitler, again without the approval of the Department of State, "to bring about a better understanding between the United States and Germany".[35]  It has been surmised that Kennedy also had personal reasons for wanting to avoid war; "He feared for the lives of his three eldest sons, Joe, Jack and Bobby, all of whom were or soon would be eligible to serve."[36]

Kennedy also argued strongly against giving military and economic aid to the United Kingdom.   "Democracy is finished in England.  It may be here," he stated in the Boston Sunday Globe of November 10, 1940.  With Nazi German troops having overrun Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and France, and with bombs falling daily on Great Britain, Kennedy unambiguously and repeatedly stated his belief that this war was not about saving democracy from National Socialism (Nazism) or from Fascism.
Did his son, John F. Kennedy, share some of his father's beliefs in the 1930s?

Apparently.
A new book out in Germany reveals how President Kennedy was a secret admirer of the Nazis.
. . .
President Kennedy's travelogues and letters chronicling his wanderings through Germany before WWII, when Adolf Hitler was in power, have been unearthed and show him generally in favour of the movement that was to plunge the world into the greatest war in history
(According to the Daily Mail, the book is titled: "John F. Kennedy - Among the Germans.   Travel diaries and letters 1937-1945".  Since the book was published in Germany, I would guess that's a translation of the German title.  It will be interesting to see whether it gets published here.)

To be fair, John F. Kennedy did, apparently, change his mind early in the war.  He wrote his Harvard thesis on why England was unprepared for another war.  The thesis was turned into a book, with more than a little help from professionals.

(It is odd that so many on the left hold the business dealings of Prescott Bush against his son and grandson, but are undisturbed by Joseph Kennedy's defeatism, and see no reason to blame his descendants for his sins.

A quick read through that Wikipedia biography of Joseph Kennedy will show you that he was a crony capitalist, but that he was not just a crony capitalist, in his business career.)
- 9:33 AM, 24 May 2013   [link]


They're Rioting In Stockholm Suburbs:  Who is rioting?   "Youths", of course.  Do we know anything about those youths, other than their ages?  Well, yes, but you have to read between the lines of articles like this one to understand the rioters, who are mostly immigrants, or the children of immigrants.
Overall, about 15 percent of Sweden's 9.5 million people were born abroad, compared to 10 percent 10 years ago.  The influx has mostly come from war-torn countries such as Iraq, Somalia, former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Syria.
(Any politically correct person will tell you that you should ignore the fact that four of those countries are predominantly Muslim, and that the fifth, the former Yugoslavia, had a large Muslim minority.)

Who should be blamed for the riots?  The rioters?  Of course not.
The riots that have broken out in recent days in the suburbs of Stockholm show that the many immigrants who live there have not been integrated.  The fault lies with the government and the lack of political will to take action on education and employment.
Lena Mellin, who wrote this column, appears to be a respected journalist, and is writing in Sweden's largest newspaper.

I would agree,in part, with Mellin that the Swedish government can be blamed for these riots — but not for lack of action on education and employment, but for accepting large numbers of Muslim immigrants who do not want to fit into Swedish society.

It may be illegal to say such things in Sweden, but luckily I don't live in Sweden.
- 8:02 AM, 24 May 2013   [link]


Google Does something patriotic.

I hope the Google employee who did it doesn't get fired.
- 6:25 AM, 24 May 2013   [link]


Truck Takes Out I-5 Bridge?!  Here's an early report from the Seattle Times.
A chunk of Interstate 5 collapsed into the Skagit River near Mount Vernon on Thursday evening, dumping two vehicles into the icy waters and creating a gaping hole in Washington state’s major north-south artery.

Officials said the highway will not be fixed for weeks at the very least.

Rescuers pulled three people with minor injuries from the water after the collapse, which authorities say began when a semitruck with an oversized load struck a steel beam at around 7 p.m.
Amazingly, there were no fatalities and, apparently, no serious injuries.  When I saw first reports on television, I fully expected that there would be a number of deaths from the crashes into the river.  (Or from hypothermia, as people were unable to get out of the cold water in time.)

There's feel-good story here, and lots of pictures in the Daily Mail article.

(Other early reports said three vehicles went into the river.  I'm not sure who's right.)
- 5:49 AM, 24 May 2013   [link]


"Iran To Chair U.N. Disarmament Conference"  That sounds like a sick joke, but isn't.
Iran will chair the United Nations’ most important disarmament negotiating forum during the panel’s May session, which opened today, sparking calls by an independent monitoring group for the U.S., the EU, and UN chief Ban Ki-moon to protest.   Click here for UN website.

“This is like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a women’s shelter,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, the Geneva based non-governmental organization, which announced it will hold protest events outside the UN hall featuring Iranian dissidents.
At one time, I thought that scandals such as this one would discredit the UN, and lead to reforms.  That was quite a mistake, now that I look back on it.

(By way of Kate McMillan.)
- 6:38 PM, 23 May 2013   [link]


Worth Reading:  Debra Saunders's balanced column on security leaks.

Here's her lead paragraph:
As a journalist, I am not supposed to admit this, but: I sympathize with the Obama administration's frustration over national security leaks.  After a spate of leaks last year -- notably, The Associated Press' reporting that national security officials foiled an underwear bomb 2.0 attempt last May -- Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein joined Republicans to denounce the Beltway's proclivity for leaking classified information.  "This has to stop," quoth DiFi.  "When people say they don't want to work with the United States because they can't trust us to keep a secret, that's serious."
Saunders sympathizes with that frustration, — as do I — but she also thinks that the Obama administration has gone about these investigations in the wrong way, with the wrong man heading them.  As she bluntly notes: [Attorney General] "Holder has a history of putting politics before national security."

She does not add, as I would, that some of the suspected leakers are very high in the Obama administration, and that some of the authorized leaks may have made the Obama administration look good — and damaged our national security.  Example:   It would have been better if they had held off on the announcement of the death of Osama bin Laden as long as they could, and much better if they had revealed few details about the raid.

(It would be fun to join with the "mainstream" journalists who are now outraged, or say they are outraged, by these investigations, but I can't.  The Obama administration may sometimes seem to have been borrowing methods from Inspector Clouseau, but we should not let that distract, completely, from our attention to the real problem of leaks.

FWIW, the New York Times no longer seems to be getting the lion's share of these leaks, now that Bush is no longer president.  That supports the commonly-held idea that many of those leaks were intended to undermine Bush, that there was, to be blunt, a conspiracy between some bureaucrats and a few reporters at the Times.)
- 5:13 PM, 23 May 2013   [link]


Did Lois Lerner Waive Her 5th Amendment Rights?   Legal experts differ.

(I have no opinion on the question, since I don't know enough about the law and precedents to have one.)
- 4:08 PM, 23 May 2013   [link]


The Washington Post Fact Checker, Glenn Kessler, Usually Limits Himself To, At Most, Four Pinocchios:  So IRS official Lois Lerner, last seen taking the 5th, must have seriously annoyed him, because the headline for that post is: "A bushel of Pinocchios for IRS’s Lois Lerner ".

Formally, he only gives her four, but you can see that he would like to give her give her four Pinocchios, three times, for a total of twelve.

Here's his lead paragraph:
In the days since the Internal Revenue Service first disclosed that it had targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, new information has emerged from both the Treasury inspector general’s report and congressional testimony Friday that calls into question key statements made by Lois G. Lerner, the IRS’s director of the exempt organizations division.
( I had not known that there are twelve Pinocchios to a bushel, but you learn something every day — if you are paying attention.)
- 2:05 PM, 23 May 2013   [link]


"Terrorism Suspected In Brutal London Attack"  That was the headline the Seattle Times put on this New York Times article.

If you are wondering how they came to suspect terrorism in the attack on the British serviceman, you might want to look at this Daily Mail article.

(Our "mainstream" networks did call the attack terrorism, but were reluctant to tell viewers what kind of terrorism it was.

The New York Times put the story on page A7, near the middle of their international section, with this headline: "'Barbaric' Attack in London Prompts Meeting on Terror Threat".  That's not quite as ambiguous as the headline in the Seattle Times.)
- 1:20 PM, 23 May 2013   [link]


There's Fresh Snow In The Cascades:  Enough fresh snow to close a school on the east slope of the Cascades.
A freak snowstorm in May gave students a surprise day off on Wednesday in the Cascades town of Bickleton.

Ten to 12 inches fell overnight within a 5- or 6-mile radius in the Klickitat County community at an elevation of about 3,000 feet.
The main passes east out of the Seattle area, Snoqualmie and Stevens, are 3,022 and 4,061 feet high, respectively.  Both got some snow yesterday, and both are predicted to get a mixture of snow and rain today.

Mt. Rainier got even more snow, and you can see them plowing it this morning on the webcams to the right.  (The east and gh (guidehouse) cameras will give you the best views of the plowing.)

(If you are a bluebird fancier, you may have heard of Bickleton.)
- 6:46 AM, 23 May 2013   [link]


Howard Dean Has an odd sense of humor.

Or, possibly, he is getting nervous about the Benghazi revelations.
- 5:10 AM, 23 May 2013   [link]


Apple's Irish Tax Loophole:  Here's a very brief, but probably basically correct, explanation from Floyd Norris.
Ireland seems to have been very clever.  It offers the benefit of "stateless subsidiaries" only to companies that have actual operations in Ireland.  Apple has its European headquarters there, and employs a lot of people.  In effect, Ireland pays companies to come to Ireland by offering to let them avoid taxes in their home countries.
Which can work out well for the companies, and for Ireland.

More here from Tom Maguire.
- 7:39 PM, 22 May 2013   [link]


Danny Westneat Hasn't Seen "Any Evidence" That President Obama "Has Done Anything Wrong"  So far.

On Sunday, the Seattle Times columnist gave this blanket defense of President Obama.
You can sense the same thing happening today.  President Obama’s second term feels basically over.  And he’s got 44 months to go!

Now I say that as someone who has not seen any evidence, so far, that Obama has done anything wrong, let alone illegal.  At worst in these “scandals,” he is guilty of too much message massaging (Benghazi) or of obliviousness to a hyperaggressive bureaucracy (the IRS).  If those were high crimes or misdemeanors, every president would have been impeached.
(Emphasis added.)

(You may have noticed that Westneat does not mention the one scandal that appears to disturb journalists most, the aggressive investigations of Associated Press and Fox News reporters.)

Putting out a completely false story about a riot, sparked by an offensive video, does not seem to fall into the "message massaging" category, at least to me.

It is hard to know how to react to this defense.  My first impulse was to laugh at it and suggest that the Seattle Times may want to change the Westneat picture they use with his columns to something more like these famous statues.

But along with a chuckle or two at a journalist who is determined not to see any evidence against a president he supports, we should learn from his error, since almost all of us make similar errors, from time to time.

As any cognitive dissonance theorist could tell you, Westneat doesn't see the evidence, because he doesn't want to see the evidence.  If he admits that there is evidence that President Obama has done something wrong, then Westneat will have to change his opinion about Obama.   Since he doesn't want to change that opinion, he doesn't see the evidence.

There is, I repeat, nothing unusual about this.  We have all seen, for instance, the mothers who insist that that their criminal sons are really good boys, and even the mothers who insist against all evidence — which, like Westneat, they may not be able to see — that their criminal sons did not commit the crimes for which they are serving time.

Although there is nothing unusual about this refusal to see evidence, it is, I think, a larger defect in journalists than in most other citizens.  If a journalist refuses to see — and report — evidence against his favorite leader or party, the rest of us may never see it at all.

In all the years that I have read Westneat, I can not recall a single time when he uncovered a significant Democratic scandal.  I can't help wondering whether a less partisan journalist than Westneat might have seen a few such scandals in all the years he has been working for the newspaper — if he were more open-minded, more willing to see that kind of evidence.

(You'll notice, by the way, that Westneat first tells us that there is no evidence that Obama has done anything wrong, and then supplies a little evidence — which he dismisses as unimportant.  That kind of confusion is common in a person struggling with cognitive dissonance.)
- 4:51 PM, 22 May 2013   [link]


Venezuela Has More Exciting Scandals Than We Do:   Take, for example, the scandals revealed on a leaked tape.
Venezuelan opposition congressman Ismael García reported on Monday during a press conference along with other members of the Unified Democratic Panel on a taped conversation between Mario Silva, a hardcore government supporter and anchorman of "La Hojilla" a TV show aired on state-run TV channel VTV, and Aramis Palacios, a lieutenant colonel of Cuban G2.

He explained that a "very serious situation" was mirrored in the talk. The material, García said, "would be handed over to Raúl Castro, he, who leads and directs the policy of this country."

Based on the tape, Silva said: "Speaking of devaluation, the problem is the flight of capital in some enterprises owned by (Congress Speaker) Diosdado Cabello."

The Congress Speaker might "corrupt, together with the '85 generation" the army."
And there is much more.

Is the tape authentic?  Miguel Octavio thinks so.  And Silva has stepped away from his job for health reasons, instead of staying on and defending himself.

Emiliana Duarte reacts to the tape, and subsequent events.

(If you read Spanish, you might want to look at the transcript.)
- 8:00 AM, 22 May 2013   [link]


Lois Lerner Will Take The 5th today.
Lois Lerner, an IRS official who led the agency’s tax exemption division, will invoke her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent at a scheduled House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing Wednesday.  Chairman Darrell Issa has issued a subpoena for Lerner to testify, but it is not clear whether she will make her plea in person.

Lerner’s refusal to speak raises questions about whether her testimony would have implicated the White House, or exposed criminal activity or misrepresentations on her part.  She has exchanged correspondence with the oversight committee about the IRS matter but did not disclose her knowledge of the agency’s targeting of conservative groups, according to a letter Issa wrote to Lerner last week.
Her lawyer, William W. Taylor, "previously represented former IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn in a sexual assault case".  Most likely, Taylor charges more for his services than the average criminal lawyer.
- 7:14 AM, 22 May 2013   [link]


Archives

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2
November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3

January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4
October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4
June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. and Part 4

January 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2012, Part 1, Part 2 Part 3, and Part 4
August 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3and Part 4
December 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4






Coming Soon
  • FDR and Waterboarding
  • How Long Do Wars Last?
  • Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, and Crescent Wrenches
  • De-Lawyering and Attorney General McKenna


Coming Eventually
  • JFK and Wiretaps
  • Green Republicans
  • The Rise and Fall and Rise of Black Voting
  • Abortion, Cleft Palates, and Europe
  • Kweisi Mfume's Children
  • Public Opinion During Other US Wars
  • Dual Loyalties
  • The Power Index
  • Baby Dancing
  • Jocks, but no Nerds
  • The Four Caliphs




Best Posts


Books


Strange Obama


The Unknown Bush


University Reform


Uncorrected Mistakes


Vote Fraud


The Gang of Four


Articles


Assignment Desk
(What's This?)


Columns


Common Mistakes
(What's This?)


Chomsky Cult Program


*new