Last updated:
7:29 AM, 24 October 2014



Jim Miller on Politics

  Email:
jimxc1 at gmail.com



What's he reading? Francis Parkman.

News Compilers
(Why These?)

A&L Daily
Drudge
egopnews.com
*The Grid
Hot Air
Jewish World Review
Lexis-Nexis
Lucianne
Mediaite
memeorandum
Monsters and Critics
*newser
Orbusmax
Rantburg
Real Clear Politics
SciTech Daily
Yahoo


Big Media
(Why These?)

Atlantic Monthly
BBC
CNN
Chosen Ilbo
*Daily Mail (UK)
*Deutsche Welle
Fox News
Globe and Mail (CA)
Guardian (UK)
Investor's Business Daily
Le Figaro (FR)
Le Monde (FR)
The Local (Sweden)
National Review
New Republic
New York Times
The New Yorker
Politico
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
Slate
Slashdot
The Spectator (UK)
Der Spiegel
Telegraph (UK)
Times (UK)
El Universal
U. S. News
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Washington Post
Washington Times


References:

Adherents
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Census Quick Facts
Dave Leip's Election Atlas
FactCheck
Federal Statistics
How Stuff Works
NationMaster
Refdesk
Snopes
StateMaster
Tax Facts
Unionstats
Wikipedia


Smart Media
(Why These?)

ABC News Note
*The American
The American Spectator
Michael Barone
City Journal
Commentary
Front Page Magazine
Michael Fumento
The Hill
Charles Krauthammer
Media Research
Michael Medved
New York Sun
Number Watch
PJ Media
Public Interest
Roll Call
Spinsanity
Townhall
The Weekly Standard


Blogs
(Why These?)

My Group Blog:
Sound Politics

Northwest:


The American Empire
AndrewsDad
Chief Brief
Clear Fog Blog
Coffeemonkey's weblog
Croker Sack
"DANEgerus"
Economic Freedom
Federal Way Conservative
Freedom Foundation
Hairy Thoughts
Huckleberry Online
Andy MacDonald
NW Republican
Orcinus
Public Interest Transportation Forum
<pudge/*>
Northwest Progressive Institute
*Progressive Majority
Matt Rosenberg
Seattle Blogger
Seattle Bubble
Washington Policy Center
West Sound Politics
Zero Base Thinking


Other US:


Ace of Spades HQ
Alien Corn
Ann Althouse
American Thinker
The Anchoress
Armies of Liberation
Art Contrarian
"Baldilocks"
Balloon Juice
Baseball Crank
La Shawn Barber
Beldar
Bleat
Big Government
Bookworm Room
Broadband Politics
Stuart Buck
Keith Burgess-Jackson
*Bush Center
Chef Mojo
Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
*College Insurrection
Confederate Yankee
Jules Crittenden
Daily Pundit
Discriminations
Gregory Djerejian
Daniel W. Drezner
Econlog
Econopundit
Election Law
John Ellis
Engage
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Fausta
FiveThirtyEight
Flares into Darkness
Flopping Aces
The Long War Journal
Gateway Pundit
Grasping Reality With Both Hands
Keith Hennessey
Hugh Hewitt
Siflay Hraka
Instapundit
Iowahawk
Joanne Jacobs
Jeff Jarvis
The Jawa Report
Brothers Judd
JustOneMinute
Kausfiles
Kesher Talk
Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion
Little Green Footballs
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Greg Mankiw
Marginal Revolution
Mazurland
Minding the Campus
The ModerateVoice
*The Monkey Cage Mudville Gazette
"neo-neocon"
Betsy Newmark
Newsbusters
No Watermelons Allowed
Ambra Nykola
*The Optimistic Conservative
The Ornery American
OxBlog
Parapundit
"Patterico"
Daniel Pipes
Polipundit
Political Arithmetik
Political Calculations
Pollster.com
Power and Control
Power Line
Protein Wisdom
QandO
Radio Equalizer
RedState
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Rightwing Nuthouse
Dr. Sanity
Scrappleface
Screw Loose Change
Linda Seebach
Sense of Events
Joshua Sharf
Rand Simberg
Smart Politics
The Spirit of Enterprise
Stability For Our Time
*Strange Maps
The Strata-Sphere
Andrew Sullivan
Don Surber
Sweetness & Light
Taking Hayek Seriously
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf
USS Neverdock
VDH's Private Papers
Verum Serum
Villainous Company
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Monthly
Wizbang
Dr. Weevil
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Meryl Yourish
zombietime


Canadians:


BlazingCatFur
Colby Cosh
Five Feet of Fury
Kate McMillan
Damian Penny
Bruce Rolston


Latin America:


Babalú
Caracas Chronicles
The Devil's Excrement
Venezuela News and Views


Overseas:


"Franco Aleman"
Bruce Bawer
Biased BBC
Tim Blair
*Andrew Bolt
Peter Briffa
Brussels Journal
*Bunyipitude
Butterflies and Wheels
Crooked Timber
Davids Medienkritik
Egyptian Sand Monkey
EU Referendum
Greenie Watch
Guido Fawkes
Harry's Place
Mick Hartley
Oliver Kamm
JG, Caesarea
*Le Monde Watch
¡No-Pasarán!
Fredrik Norman
Melanie Phillips
John Ray
samizdata
Shark Blog
Natalie Solent
Somtow's World
Bjørn Stærk
Laban Tall
*David Thompson
Michael Yon
This is Zimbabwe

Science Blogs:
The Blackboard
Cliff Mass Weather
Climate Audit
Climate Depot
Climate Science
*Judith Curry
Future Pundit
Gene Expression
The Loom
In The Pipeline
Roger Pielke Jr.
Real Climate
A Voyage To Arcturus
Watts Up With That?

Media Blogs:
Andrew Malcolm
Dori Monson
David Postman
Rhetorical Ammo
Tierney Lab
*White House Dossier

R-Rated:
Horse's A**
Huffington Post

*new



Pseudo-Random Thoughts


Barack Obama, President And "Shocked Outsider"  Charles Krauthammer says that Obama's standard reaction to his administration's failures is absurd.
The president is upset.  Very upset.  Frustrated and angry.  Seething about the government’s handling of Ebola, said the front-page headline in the New York Times last Saturday.

There’s only one problem with this pose, so obligingly transcribed for him by the Times.   It’s his government.  He’s president.  Has been for six years.   Yet Barack Obama reflexively insists on playing the shocked outsider when something goes wrong within his own administration.
And that reaction is no longer working, politically, as it once did:  "These shows of calculated outrage — and thus distance — are becoming not just unconvincing but unamusing."

A head football coach — with complete authority over personnel choices — could not get away, year after year, with acting shocked when his team loses, again and again.

To extend the football metaphor, when I learned that Obama had barely talked to Kathleen Sebelius while she was trying to implement ObamaCare, it was like learning that a head coach hadn't talked to his offensive coordinator during an entire season.

I didn't expect Obama to be good manager as president — he had no executive experience, and executive talent, especially political executive talent, is rare, — but I did expect him to go through the motions, to at least, from time to time, check on what his subordinates were doing.

When he poses as a shocked outsider, he is confessing that he isn't even going through the motions.

(It's hard to know how much of that "shocked outsider" is just a pose.  I am inclined to think that he really doesn't spend the time managing that he ought to — and that he is in fairly close touch with the political efforts of his underlings.  We still don't know why some IRS officials visited the White House so often, but you don't have to be a Republican to be suspicious about those visits.)
- 7:29 AM, 24 October 2014   [link]


What Happens When You Serve Food From McDonald's To Organic Food Experts?  They love it.
A pair of TV pranksters passed off McDonalds food to a group of food experts who declared how great it was and how much they loved it!

A pair of Dutch TV pranksters have pulled the ultimate trick at a fresh and organic food expo full of grub experts when they served them food they had bought at the local McDonalds.   What’s more though, these so called experts fell for it saying how much they bloody loved it!
The pranksters, Sacha and Cedrique, cut up the food from a McDonald's and added a few touches to make it look more "high end".

Here's the video, with English subtitles:

That is funny, but we should recognize that almost all of us can be fooled in similar ways.  Example:  When the brown coloring is removed from cola drinks, most of us don't recognize them, from the taste alone.
- 6:36 AM, 24 October 2014   [link]


Good News on Amber Vinson.
Barely a week after being diagnosed with Ebola, Texas nurse Amber Vinson is free of the deadly virus, her family said on Wednesday night.

“We are overjoyed to announce that, as of [Tuesday] evening, officials at Emory University Hospital and the Centers for Disease Control are no longer able to detect virus in her body,” read a statement from a family spokesperson.
Here's hoping she makes a complete recovery, and soon.

(I don't have anything new to add to my speculation on why she and Nina Pham are doing so well.)
- 8:36 AM, 23 October 2014   [link]


The Terrorist Who Killed The Canadian Soldier And Attacked The Canadian Parliament had a very multicultural background.
Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, the slain 32-year-old suspected killer of a Canadian Forces soldier near Parliament Hill, was a labourer and small-time criminal – a man who had had a religious awakening and seemed to have become mentally unstable.

Mr. Zehaf-Bibeau was born in 1982 and was the son of Bulgasem Zehaf, a Quebec businessman who appears to have fought in 2011 in Libya, and Susan Bibeau, the deputy chairperson of a division of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board.  The two were divorced in 1999.
(Zehaf-Bibeau is often described as a Muslim "convert", but by Muslim law he was a Muslim from birth because his father was Muslim, so the Globe and Mail may be right to say he had an "awakening", rather than a "conversion".  And, as you may have guessed from the name, his father was an immigrant to Canada.)

Most will conclude, from that marriage, that Susan Bibeau was not hostile to immigrants, even immigrants with very different values from most Canadians.  Which makes her particular government job interesting, to say the least.

(The Daily Mail has the full tabloid treatment of the attack, along with many links to other accounts.

A commenter at Small Dead Animals pointed out that Zehaf-Bibeau's family background has some eerie similarities to that of Canada's most famous mass murderer, Marc Lépine.)
- 7:36 AM, 23 October 2014   [link]


Second Terrorist Attack In Canada:  On Monday, a Muslim convert, Martin "Ahmad" Couture-Rouleau, ran over two Canadian soldiers, killing one of them.  Couture-Rouleau was shot and killed by the police, and probably died as he wanted to.  (Earlier, he had been blocked from going to Syria to join ISIS.)

The authorities believe, as of now, that he was a lone wolf, not part of some organized conspiracy.

This morning, there was an attack in Ottawa, which may be ongoing as I write.   Early reports in these attacks are often wrong, but this BBC story is probably more right than wrong.
A gunman shot a soldier at a war memorial in Ottawa, then ran into the nearby parliament building where he exchanged gunfire with police.

According to a government minister, the wounded soldier later died. One gunman is also believed dead.

More shots were fired outside a nearby shopping centre and several buildings around the city are on lockdown.
I must add, immediately, that though I suspect that these two attacks have similar motivations, I don't have any direct evidence on the second.  And may not, for a while.
- 10:20 AM, 22 October 2014   [link]


Nina Pham is getting better.
Nina Pham, the first Dallas nurse to contract Ebola, has had her health status upgraded from "fair" to "good," according to a statement released on Tuesday evening by the National Institutes of Health.
We can all hope that she gets well soon — and that we learn from her recovery the best ways to treat others infected with the Ebola virus.

This CNN article describes some of the advantages that Ebola patients have in the West.
Early, high-quality treatment

This may be the most critical factor in beating Ebola.

The survivors in the United States all have one thing in common -- they were rushed to two of the country's four hospitals that have been preparing for years to treat a highly infectious disease such as Ebola.
Please note the "may", and remember that thousands in West Africa have received much less treatment, and still survived.

I'm inclined to think, on general grounds, that if you can keep Ebola patients stable with rehydration, and other standard supportive care, most will survive because their immune systems will eventually create antibodies against the virus.  And it may be significant that Pham received antibodies from an earlier survivor, Dr. Kent Brantly.   And that Brantly had received a similar donation, earlier, from another Ebola survivor.

(Could West Africa survivors be a regular source of antibodies that could cure others?  It's an possibility that should be explored, in my opinion.)
- 9:01 AM, 22 October 2014   [link]


Dreadnought:  I got out of bed late this morning because I was unable to resist spending some more time with my current night time book, Robert Massie's Dreadnought.

I have been studying it because, like many others, I am struck by the parallels between now and pre-World War I Europe, with China now acting much as Imperial Germany did then.

Want an example of the parallels?  Here's a minor one:  Republican presidents have, on the whole, had more success since World War II in negotiating with our enemies than Democratic presidents.  (Think of Nixon's opening to China, if you need an example.)   Similarly, British Prime Minister Salisbury was more successful negotiating with European powers than his Liberal rival, William Gladstone.   Gladstone, like Jimmy Carter, annoyed many other leaders with his open religiosity.   (There's a famous quip that captures that annoyance:  "I don't object to Gladstone always having the ace of trumps up his sleeve, but merely to his belief that the Almighty put it there.")

If those parallels are what most interest you about the book, then you do have to study it because Massie structured his history in a way that is fascinating, and difficult.  The book is (mostly) a series of mini-biographies of the leaders of the European nations involved in the naval arms race that began with the revolutionary British ship, Dreadnought.  Chapter 19, for instance, is titled "Joseph Chamberlain and Imperial Preference".  (If you are wondering what that's about, you can find some answers here.)

The mini-biographies are fascinating; Massie has a wonderful set of characters to work with, and a gift for finding the anecdotes that make them come to life.

But they also break up the underlying narrative, the story of the naval arms race that led to World War I, so a reader who is interested in that has to skip back and forth in the book.

(A minor but important technical point:  In general, guns are compared by their diameters; we say, for instance, that the Iowa class had 16-inch guns.  It is easy, if you haven't followed military affairs, to slip into thinking that the shells from these guns are proportional to their diameters, rather than their volumes.  Everything else being equal, a 16-inch shell will have about four times the volume of a 10-inch shell.)
- 1:22 PM, 21 October 2014   [link]


Karl Rove As "Satan" For Some On The Right?  It is not surprising that Karl Rove became a kind of "Satan" figure for many on the left.  After all, Rove managed two winning gubernatorial campaigns for George W. Bush in Texas, two winning presidential campaigns for Bush, and a winning off-year election in 2002.

And Rove has been trying, with somewhat less success, to defeat Democrats since then.

But what is surprising is that Rove has become a similar "Satan" figure for some on the right.
Karl Rove targets attorney general race in California.”  “Who’s afraid of Kamala Harris? Karl Rove!” “Karl Rove Attacks — We Need Your Help!”  Karl Rove’s starring role in the 2010 California attorney general’s race came as a surprise to Karl Rove, who wasn’t actually involved in that particular contest.  This happens with him all the time.   For the Left, Rove served for many years as the go-to bogeyman, the marquee name with which to conjure before Democrats discovered Charles and David Koch.  “Karl Rove” was how the Left pronounced “Satan.”

What has been peculiar in the years since then is Rove’s transformation from left-wing hate totem to right-wing hate totem, an all-purpose villain whose name is used liberally by tea-party groups and conservative populists raising funds for races in which he has no involvement.  On and on they go: “Don’t let Karl Rove squish Allen West!”  “Gingrich: We can’t let Karl Rove and a bunch of billionaires handpick GOP candidates for Senate.”
Kevin Williamson explains why those attacks on Rove from the right are unwarranted, explains, for instance, that Rove has generally stayed out of Republican primaries.

It's a good read for anyone who usually votes Republican, or for anyone who just wants to understand some of the stresses in the Grand Old Party.

(For a very crude example of the attacks on Rove, take a look at the first comment, here.)
- 1:10 PM, 20 October 2014   [link]


The Chicago Tribune Says That Senator Dick Durbin Is A Hyper-Partisan Obstructionist And Often Wrong On The Issues:  And that's in their editorial endorsing him.
We recalled the last time an Illinoisan rose to the top of the Senate: Minority Leader Everett McKinley Dirksen, a Republican, was known for his civility and his willingness to set partisanship aside and get things done.  We contrasted Dirksen with the 2008 incumbent, then and now the second most powerful man in Democratic leadership and a practitioner of needless partisanship.  When TV cameras are on, we wrote, you can count on him to show up and whack a Republican.

In the end we endorsed Sen. Dick Durbin for re-election; his Republican opponent wasn't ready for prime time.  And now, with sincere respect for Durbin's long service and comparable concerns about his 2014 Republican opponent, we endorse Durbin's candidacy for another six-year term.  We often disagree with Durbin on issues.  But we would rather have Illinois represented by a highly capable partisan than by a less capable partisan.
(Emphasis added.)

As they admit, their argument "may elude the many Illinois citizens who tell us they're livid not only over Washington tribalism but also Washington gridlock".

The argument doesn't elude me; I just think that — if you are opposed to obstruction — you ought to prefer a less capable obstructionist to a more capable obstructionist, because the less capable obstructionist will do less damage.

Apparently the Tribune believes that it is almost required to endorse one of the candidates in this race.  (Similarly, the Seattle Times felt compelled to endorse Seattle's "congressman-for-life" Jim McDermott, since his opponent — in their view — is not qualified.)  They would have been better off not making no endorsement in this race.

(Here are the Wikipedia articles on the 2014 Illinois Senate race, Dick Durbin, and Durbin's opponent, Jim Oberweiss.  And here's the campaign site of the Republican the Tribune preferred, Doug Truax.)
- 12:44 PM, 20 October 2014   [link]


How Good Are Government Economic Forecasts?   "Not very."
Government economic forecasts receive a great deal of attention and are used to make a case for or against legislation or public policies.  How good are the forecasts?  The answer: not very.  Forecasting is an inexact science at best, and the trust that Congress and the public invest in these estimates is not warranted.
. . .
My analysis of 1999-2013 reveals that the CBO’s real GDP growth forecasts for the next year were off, on average, by 1.7 percentage points, either too high or low.  Administration forecasts were similarly off by a slightly larger 1.8 percentage points on average, also to high or too low.  Given that the average growth rate during this period was only 2.1%, errors of this magnitude are substantial.

Perhaps most damning: History is a better predictor of annual growth than government forecasts.  Simply assuming that GDP growth will be 3.1% in each year—the average annual rate for the 30 years that precede the study period—results in an average forecast error of 1.5 percentage points.
The economists at the Congressional Budget Office know our economy and our budgets about as well as anyone can.  Nonetheless, they, and other official forecasters, simply aren't very good.

Two thoughts on why this is so, and why it will continue to be so:  First, the elaborate mathematical models constructed by economists are, at best, only rough maps of the economy, for reasons that I hope are obvious.  (If not, try to imagine what hundreds of millions of consumers, just in the United States, will do next year.)

Second, the models do not, and can not, include what British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan may have said to a reporter who asked what might change his government's course:   "Events, my dear boy, events."

Those events can be positive or negative, can include everything from the introduction of polio vaccines to terrorist attacks.

Given this uncertainty, what should budgeteers do?  My own preference would be for them to be a little pessimistic in their budgeting; for example, if the forecasts say we will have 3.5 percent growth in the next year, then we should write budgets that assume a little less than that, say 3.0 percent.

Others, depending on their temperaments, may prefer using the estimates as they are, or even using optimistic assumptions.  (Of course, planners often do the latter, but almost never admit to doing so.)

But what everyone who makes a government budget should do is recognize, openly and publicly, the uncertainty in those estimates.  We have to build our budget houses on the sand of untrustworthy economic predictions, so we should be clear about the risks that the sand will shift underneath us.

(If you read the entire op-ed, you'll learn some interesting process details about our budget forecasts, from a man who helped make them.  And see a few examples of mistaken long-term forecasts.)
- 6:27 AM, 20 October 2014   [link]


Archives

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2
November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3

January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4
October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4
June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4
May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2009, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2009, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. and Part 4

January 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2010, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2010, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2011, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2012, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2012, Part 1, Part 2 Part 3, and Part 4
August 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3and Part 4
December 2012, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
March 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2013, , Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
November 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
December 2013, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4

January 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
February 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4
March 2014, Part 1. Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
April 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
May 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
June 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
July 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
August 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
September 2014, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
October 2014, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3






Coming Soon
  • Plan 17 Conservatives
  • FDR and Waterboarding
  • How Long Do Wars Last?
  • Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, and Crescent Wrenches
  • De-Lawyering and Attorney General McKenna


Coming Eventually
  • JFK and Wiretaps
  • Green Republicans
  • The Rise and Fall and Rise of Black Voting
  • Abortion, Cleft Palates, and Europe
  • Kweisi Mfume's Children
  • Public Opinion During Other US Wars
  • Dual Loyalties
  • The Power Index
  • Baby Dancing
  • Jocks, but no Nerds
  • The Four Caliphs




Best Posts


Books


Strange Obama


The Unknown Bush


University Reform


Uncorrected Mistakes


Vote Fraud


The Gang of Four


Articles


Assignment Desk
(What's This?)


Columns


Common Mistakes
(What's This?)


Chomsky Cult Program


*new