Last updated: 2:55 PM, 4 July 2008 |
Jim Miller on Politics |
Email: jimxc1 at gmail.com |
![]() News Compilers (Why These?) A&L Daily Drudge Hot Air Jewish World Review Lexis-Nexis Lucianne memeorandum Newsback Orbusmax Rantburg Real Clear Politics SciTech Daily Yahoo Big Media (Why These?) Atlantic Monthly BBC CNN Fox News Globe and Mail (CA) Guardian (UK) *Investor's Business Daily Le Figaro (FR) Le Monde (FR) *The Local (Sweden) National Review New Republic New York Times The New Yorker *The Politico Seattle PI Seattle Times Slate Slashdot The Spectator (UK) Telegraph (UK) Times of London (UK) U. S. News USA Today Wall Street Journal Washington Post References: Adherents Bureau of Labor Statistics Census Quick Facts Historical Statistics of the United States Dave Leip's Election Atlas FactCheck Federal Statistics How Stuff Works NationMaster 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Refdesk Snopes StateMaster Tax Facts Unionstats Wikipedia Internet Tools: BugMeNot Scirus WebEnalysis Webmonkey Smart Media (Why These?) ABC News Note The American Spectator Michael Barone City Journal Commentary Morton Kondracke Front Page Magazine Michael Fumento The Hill Charles Krauthammer Media Research Michael Medved New York Sun Number Watch Jim Pinkerton Public Interest Roll Call Spinsanity Tech Central Station Townhall The Weekly Standard Blogs (Why These?) My Group Blog:
Sound Politics
Northwest: AndrewsDad Chief Brief M. L. Cole Seth Cooper Croker Sack P. Scott Cummins Daily Recyler "DANEgerus" Election Reforms Timothy Ellis Full Contact Politics Michael Gersh Timothy Goddard Alexander Hamilton Ron Hebron Horologium Island Republican Kevin Leo Marsha Louise Andy MacDonald Brian Maloney Medved Fans *My Own Side James J. Na David Neiwert NW Republican Ambra Nykola Dave Oliveria Pajama Jihad Paloustics Jacqueline Passey Greg Piper Pull on Superman's Cape Respectfully Republican Matt Rosenberg Stefan Sharkansky Sunbreak City Michael Totten Wax Tadpole Other US: Alien Corn Ann Althouse American Thinker Ankle Biting Pundits Steve Antler Back Talk "Baldilocks" Balloon Juice La Shawn Barber Michael Barone Austin Bay N. Z. Bear Belmont Club Rebecca Blood 2 Blowhards Jeff Brokaw J. Bowen Chicago Boyz David Burge Keith Burgess-Jackson Stuart Buck Byrd Droppings Phil Carter Chef Mojo Citizen Smash Classical Values *Gina Cobb Code Blue Susanna Cornett David Crawford Jules Crittenden Counterterrorism Gerry Daly Brad DeLong Democratic Peace Diplomad Discriminations Gregory Djerejian Daniel W. Drezner Kevin Drum Election Law Eject! Eject! Eject! John Ellis Dean Esmay Amitai Etzioni Gary Farber Flares into Darkness *Flopping Aces *The Fourth Rail Joe Gandelman Gateway Pundit Christopher Genovese Jane Galt Rich Hailey Henry Hanks Hugh Hewitt Bill Hobbs David Hogberg Siflay Hraka David Huber Instapundit Jeff Jarvis Joanne Jacobs *The Jawa Report Charles Johnson Brothers Judd Mickey Kaus Kesher Talk Jim Lileks Michael Lopez Donald Luskin Tom Maguire Michelle Malkin Greg Mankiw Joshua Marshall Mazurland *Megan McArdle Jeff and Stephanie Medcalf MedPundit H. D. Miller Diane E. Moon Edward Morrissey Rodger Morrow *Mudville Gazette Robert Musil Mutated Monkeys My Election Analysis Mystery Pollster Pete Nelson "neo-neocon" Betsy Newmark Newsbusters Jane Novak OmbudsGod The Ornery American Jack O'Toole Oxblog "Patterico" Randall Parker "Lynxx Pherrett" Daniel Pipes Polipundit Political Teen Political Arithmetik Political Calculations *Power and Control Power Line Protein Wisdom *QandO Bill Quick Greg Ransom Red State *Right Wing News Rightwing Nuthouse Patrick Ruffini Dr. Sanity Alec Saunders Scrappleface *Screw Loose Change *Linda Seebach *Sense of Events Donald Sensing Joshua Sharf Rand Simberg Chuck Simmins Geitner Simmons Roger Simon Reid Stott The Strata-Sphere Andrew Sullivan *Sweetness & Light Tacitus TalkLeft Chip Taylor *TigerHawk *USS Neverdock VDH's Private Papers Volokh Conspiracy Wizbang Dr. Weevil Matt Welch Matthew Yglesias Meryl Yourish Pejman Yousefzadeh *zombietime Canadians: Colby Cosh *Five Feet of Fury Kate McMillan Damian Penny Bruce Rolston Winds of Change Latin America: Babalu *Caracas Chronicles Mark in Mexico *Venezuela News and Views Overseas: "Franco Aleman" "Alexei" Bruce Bawer Biased BBC "Big Pharoah" Bilious Young Fogey Tim Blair Peter Briffa Brussels Journal Scott Burgess Butterflies and Wheels Charko Arthur Chrenkoff Crooked Timber Davids Medienkritik Egyptian Sand Monkey EU Referendum Europundits Fear and Loathing in Paris Greenie Watch *Harry's Place Mick Hartley Iraq the Model Oliver Kamm *The Other War ¡No-Pasarán! Fredrik Norman Melanie Phillips John Ray *samizdata Natalie Solent Bjørn Stærk Laban Tall Viking Pundit Michael Yon *This is Zimbabwe *Science Blogs:
*Climate Audit*Climate Science *Future Pundit Gene Expression *The Loom In The Pipeline *Prometheus *Real Climate A Voyage To Arcturus *Watts Up With That? Media Blogs:
*David Postman*Rhetorical Ammo Tierney Lab R-Rated:
*Horse's A***Huffington Post Dormant:
*new
|
Pseudo-Random ThoughtsHappy Fourth Of July! And thank you to all those who made it possible.
![]() (Picture taken at the beginning of the Kirkland 4th of July parade.) - 2:55 PM, 4 July 2008
[link] Did Barack Obama Work His Way Through College And Law School? That's what
he claims in his latest national ad. FactCheck fact-checked his claim, and found . . .
discrepancies.
The ad begins with the announcer telling us that Obama "worked his way through college and Harvard Law." Actually, Obama took out loans to get himself through college, as we heard in a 60-second ad his campaign began running last month. We don't know how much assistance his family provided.I had many more jobs when I was in college and graduate school than Obama did in college and law school, but I would not claim that I worked my way through either. And that's just one of the "discrepancies" in the ad. What's strangest about this discrepancy, along with all the other discrepancies, is that there is no need for Obama to tell us these fibs. Would many of us think much less of him if we learned that his grandparents paid much of his way through school? And then there is the risk of being caught. At some point, even our "mainstream" reporters are going to notice just how many of these discrepancies there are, how many times what Obama says about his past turns out to be not exactly true. (I hope to get time to analyze fully the two ads he has put out, looking for discrepancies — unless I find that someone else has already done that.) - 12:51 PM, 3 July 2008
[link] A Break In The Thunderstorms: So I can put up this brief post.
We have had about twelve hours of off-and-on thunderstorms here, with lightning sometimes close enough
so that I twice thought it prudent to shut down my main computer.
Though not always in time. This morning a close strike bounced the power and shut down the computer. As far as I can tell, no damage was done, except, possibly, to a Firefox temporary file. The Linux distribution that I use, Ubuntu, defaults to a "journaling" file system, which is very good at recovering from unexpected power outages, and other disasters. - 9:14 AM, 3 July 2008
More: Here's a general description of
journaling files systems, if the idea is
new to you. By using them, you make your file operations slower, but much more secure.
- 1:40 PM, 3 July 2008
[link] Sometimes A Really Stupid Comment: Such as the one by "bigdaddyvike"
in this post.
Inspires a truly brilliant reply, such as the one in this
post. Read the
whole thing to learn a little about that extraordinary warrior, Colonel Bud Day.
- 2:29 PM, 2 July 2008
[link] "A Shortage Of Sand": That's the well-known punch line to a joke about
Communism. You can find many more jokes about Communism
here. Even if you
are a fan of jokes about Communism, as I have been for many years, you will probably find a few that are
new to you.
By way of ¡No-Pasarán!, where you can see a not-too-bad cartoon joke about Communism. (Though maybe not a joke you want to show the youngest kids.) (Young enough so that you haven't heard the joke? Here's the rest of it: What would you have after five years if Communists ran the Sahara?) - 8:30 AM, 2 July 2008
[link] One Cute Puppy — And A Few Outraged Muslims: In Scotland. Here's
the story.
A postcard featuring a cute puppy sitting in a policeman's hat advertising a Scottish police force's new telephone number has sparked outrage from Muslims.Or at least a few who say they are outraged. My guess is that most Muslims in the area don't care about the puppy (and that some, especially the kids, think the puppy is cute), but that a few are using this innocent picture to divide Muslims from their Scottish neighbors. The outraged minority trick often works, which is why it is so often used. (The Tayside police used the picture of Rebel because he is a police dog in training — and stories about his training had attracted favorable attention, and many visitors to their web site. Here's a sample with a picture of the puppy, looking cute.) - 7:31 AM, 2 July 2008
More: Maybe
just one outraged Muslim.
Dundee councillor Mohammed Asif claimed the postcard, advertising Tayside Police's new non-emergency telephone number, could offend some Muslims because it features a black German shepherd dog sitting in a police officer's hat.Who may not be all that outraged, but saw a chance to pose, and took it, as politicians often do. (Incidentally, if the article is correct, Muslims accept dogs for hunting and guard duties; they just reject them as pets. Which I don't agree with, but find more reasonable than an absolute prohibition.) By way of Damian Penny.) - 1:02 PM, 2 July 2008
[link] Happy Birthday! To our Canadian friends, who are celebrating Canada Day.
![]() Since Canada was founded in 1867, this is their 141st birthday. The man most responsible for that founding was Canada's first Prime Minister, John Macdonald. Today is a good day to thank Candians for their contributions in the war in Afghanistan, and for being, on the whole, such fine neighbors. (And for those who know a little about World War II, it's a good day to admire their contribution* to victory in that war.) (Picture notes: This flag appears every Canada Day, a few blocks from where I live, along with the American flag, which you can just see behind it. Today, I finally met the couple that own the flags. He's American; she's Canadian. And the two seem to be getting along very well, which may be a lesson for our two nations. *Example: The Canadians landed on one of the five D-Day beaches, Juno, and advanced the farthest inland that day.) - 2:54 PM, 1 July 2008
[link] Basic Facts On Washington State's 2004 Gubernatorial Election: Stefan
Sharkansky, who did heroic work in digging up those facts, has them in two posts. It is impossible
to read the first without concluding that
laws were broken by election officials. It is impossible to read the
second without concluding that the US attorney,
John McKay, ignored evidence of crimes.
It is my considered opinion — which I have held since about December, 2004 — that illegal votes gave Christine Gregoire her narrow win. It is my considered opinion — which I came to more recently — that John McKay could have proved that, had he been willing to look at the evidence, and act on it. For this dereliction of duty, McKay was fired by the Bush administration. The firing made him a hero to most of our local journalists. (This is the latest vote fraud post, a category I have been neglecting. I hope to have at least one post in the category every month, and, if possible, every week. There is, so far, no shortage of material. If you see a story on vote fraud, anywhere in the United States, I would appreciate you telling me about it.) - 1:29 PM, 1 July 2008
[link] Democratic Congresswoman Laura Richardson has a very nice car. And you are
paying for it.
When she arrived in Congress last fall, Rep. Laura Richardson sought out a vehicle that would match her newfound status.As you would expect, a Lincoln Town Car does not get good gas mileage. Incidentally, she's a protégé of Maxine Waters, so Richardson is probably a leftwing extremist — as well as a fan of Lincoln Town Cars. If her name sounds familiar, that's probably because you have heard about her adventures in real estate. (I have to admit that, in some ways, I like politicians who don't even pretend to be working for the public. I don't think that they should be in office, but their open grabs for goodies are more honest than the sneakier methods many other politicians use.) - 10:05 AM, 1 July 2008
[link] Who Is Financing Obama? David Brooks has some
lists, including
this one:
When you break it out by individual companies, you find that employees of Goldman Sachs gave more to Obama than workers of any other employer. The Goldman Sachs geniuses are followed by employees of the University of California, UBS, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, National Amusements, Lehman Brothers, Harvard and Google. At many of these workplaces, Obama has a three- or four-to-one fund-raising advantage over McCain.So Obama is getting strong support from big money, and from radical leftists including William Ayers and Tom Hayden. That's a pretty good trick. If Obama is elected president, at least one of these groups is going to be disappointed by what he does in office. (Brooks thinks the Goldman Sachs crowd will be happy; I think both groups will be disappointed, but for different reasons.) - 7:27 AM, 1 July 2008
[link] Democratic Party Officials are
"horrified".
DURHAM -- Allegations that a local Democratic official and her husband were involved in satanic rituals that included shackling people to beds, caging them and depriving them of food and water have horrified county party leaders.As they should be. Johnson was "interested in trying to attract more young Democrats" to the party. Satanic rituals will attract some young Democrats, but probably not a majority, at least in North Carolina. - 5:58 AM, 1 July 2008
More: Here's the web site for their company,
Indigo Dawn, a "resource for spiritual
growth". The company offers "products and services to promote enlightenment and to assist in the
development of self-empowerment and divine potential". Those don't sound compatible with
satanic rituals.
- 10:17 AM, 1 July 2008
[link] The New York Times Gives Secrets To Our Enemies: Again.
Late last year, top Bush administration officials decided to take a step they had long resisted. They drafted a secret plan to make it easier for the Pentagon's Special Operations forces to launch missions into the snow-capped mountains of Pakistan to capture or kill top leaders of Al Qaeda.Note the key words in those three paragraphs: "secret" and "highly classified." The New York Times didn't just publish this story on the plan, they put it on their front page. In fact, it's the lead story, just in case our Al Qaeda enemies might miss it, if it were back among the obituaries. Here's a small suggestion for the New York Times: The next time the newspaper publishes another story revealing our secrets in the war on terror, they should accompany it with an estimate of the number of deaths that will result from the story. American deaths, allied deaths, and bystander deaths. They should let us know, in other words, how much their actions will cost us, and others. One absolutely inevitable consequence of this story will be to cause problems for us with Pakistan, possibly terrible problems. The bureaucrats who leaked this story, the reporters who wrote it, and editors who decided to publish it all know that. But for some reason all are willing to antagonize an important Muslim ally, an ally with nuclear weapons. - 3:41 PM, 30 June 2008
[link] Some Of Them Are Lying: And some of them are ignorant about
oil production.
"I want you to think about this," Barack Obama said in Las Vegas last week. "The oil companies have already been given 68 million acres of federal land, both onshore and offshore, to drill. They're allowed to drill it, and yet they haven't touched it — 68 million acres that have the potential to nearly double America's total oil production."Read the rest if you want to see why they they are wrong. Is Obama lying or ignorant? Good question, to which I do not have a definitive answer. But at the very least we can say that Obama was reckless to make this argument. - 12:45 PM, 30 June 2008
[link] Violent Leftists For Obama: There are
more of them than you might think.
You probably have read about Obama's ties to unrepentant Weatherman Bill Ayers, but Ayers is only one
of many.
Progressives for Obama resembles a Who's Who of SDS luminaries. In addition to Hayden, Rudd, and Davidson, the group includes Bob Pardun, SDS's education secretary during the 1966-67 school year; Paul Buhle, a radical professor who has recently attempted to revive SDS; Mickey and Dick Flacks, red-diaper babies who helped craft 1962's Port Huron Statement, a seminal New Left document; and SDS's third president, Todd Gitlin. Age and experience have mellowed some of the SDSers in Obama's camp. Gitlin, for instance, has evolved into a respected Ivy League professor and milquetoast liberal. But others still glory in a past that can only damage Obama's future. The aging New Left still practices a therapeutic politics that places a higher value on feelings of personal liberation than on restrained pursuit of political aims.Or, to be blunt, most are still willing to substitute direct action for elections. Regardless of the consequences. Why are they are backing Obama? Because they think his campaign is a step toward bringing about the radical change that they still want. They might be wrong, but we shouldn't dismiss the possibility that they are right. (For some background on the Students for a Democratic Society, you could look at this Wikipedia article. It's written from the left but is not actively dishonest, though this article, on the latest version of SDS, may be.) - 12:18 PM, 30 June 2008
[link] Did Think Progress Lie About McCain? That's what "Patterico"
thinks.
This Think Progress post is a lie. At best, the story is that McCain doesn't remember the last time he pumped his own gas. Even that is a non-story, since nobody pumps their own gas while on the campaign trail. Someone ask Obama when he last pumped his own gas.But I think it more likely that the author of the piece is just careless (and probably biased). For the post to be a lie, the writer would have to have known what he was writing was false. Patterico thinks the writer is malevolent; I think it more likely that the writer is incompetent (and possibly) malevolent, since such mistakes come more easily to those who are prisoners of their own bigotry. - 8:12 AM, 30 June 2008
[link] George Orwell And Dishwashers: In the last week or so, I have been mining
Orwell's collected essays
again, and have found much gold in that rich lode. Along with the gold is some worthless rock, and
a few strange chunks such as this solution to a daily chore:
If one thinks of simply in terms of saving trouble and plans one's home as ruthlessly as one would plan a machine, it is possible to imagine houses and flats which would be comfortable and would entail very little work. Central heating, rubbish chutes, proper consumption of smoke, cornerless rooms, electrically-warmed beds and elimination of carpets would make a lot of difference. But as for washing-up, I see no solution except to do it communally, like laundry. Every morning the municipal van will stop at your door and carry off a box of dirty crocks, handing you a box of clean ones (marked with your initial, of course) in return. This would hardly be more difficult to organise than the daily diaper service which was operating before the war. And, though it would mean that some people would have to be full-time washers-up, as some people are now full-time laundry-workers, the all-over saving in labour and fuel would be enormous. The alternatives are to continue fumbling about with greasy dishmops, or to eat out of paper containers. (p. 828)When I read this passage, I immediately wondered when dishwashers had been invented. A quick search showed me that the first practical one was invented by a remarkable American woman, Josephine Cochrane, and shown at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair. Most were used in hotels and restaurants until the 1950s, but it would not have taken a big leap of imagination for Orwell to realize that home models might be available, and relatively soon. (Orwell was right about electric blankets and heating pads, but they have been around since the early early 1900s. He probably got his aversion to doing dishes from his time as a plongeur in Paris.) - 9:08 PM, 29 June 2008
[link] Why Was Tony Rezko Broke? Long time Obama friend and supporter Tony Rezko
has declared bankruptcy, after years of help on business deals from government insiders, and after receiving
immense loans from dubious sources. That's like a gambler stacking the deck — and losing
the card game anyway.
That metaphor may be appropriate, considering one of the reasons Rezko is bankrupt. Even as Antoin "Tony" Rezko's fate continued to hang in the balance at his political corruption trial Thursday, his legal peril grew with the revelation that he's wanted in Las Vegas for skipping out on large gambling debts.(Rezko was convicted, as you almost certainly know. And now the prosecutors are trying very hard to persuade him to talk.) Obama is said to be a poker player, but, as far as I know, did not join Rezko in these sprees. But they do give us one more reason to wonder about the ties between the two. (More questions about Rezko and his gambling problem here. And an interesting coincidence (?) here.) - 6:58 PM, 29 June 2008
[link] Another Policy Success For Pelosi? When the Democratic Congress passed an
increase in the minimum wage, opponents argued that the increase would make it harder for kids to find
jobs, especially minority kids. That appears to have
happened.
The summer job market for teens is suffering along with the rest of the economy. And those jobs will be harder to find this year for the poorer kids who need them the most as laid-off adults compete for work at the lowest rung.Though you won't find a word about that minimum wage increase in this AP article. - 3:46 PM, 29 June 2008
[link] ArchivesJune 2002July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002, Part 1 and Part 2 November 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 December 2002, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 January 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 February 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 March 2003, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 April 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 May 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 June 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 August 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 September 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 October 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 November 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 December 2003, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 January 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 February 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 March 2004, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 April 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 May 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 June 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 August 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 September 2004, Part 1, Part 2. Part 3, and Part 4 October 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 November 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 December 2004, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 January 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 February 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 March 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 April 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 May 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 June 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 August 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 September 2005, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 October 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 November 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 December 2005, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 January 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 February 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 March 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 April 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 May 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 June 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 August 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 September 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 October 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 November 2006, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 December 2006, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 January 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 February 2007, Part 1 and Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 March 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 April 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 May 2007, Part 1 Part 2, and Part 3, and Part 4 June 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 August 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 September 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 October 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 November 2007, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 December 2007, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 January 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 February 2008, Part 1 Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 March 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 April 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 May 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 June 2008, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4 July 2008, Part 1 |
Coming Soon
Coming Eventually
Best Posts Books Strange Obama
University Reform Vilsack Meter Uncorrected Mistakes Vote Fraud
The Gang of Four
Articles Assignment Desk (What's This?)
Columns Common Mistakes (What's This?)
Letters Chomsky Cult Program
*new |